Dismissed
M Shiva Kumar v. Nagasani Sri Ramulu
Telangana HCCRP/1032/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I
[3218 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
clvlL REVISION PETITION NO: 1032 OF 20'14
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 04.02.20'14 in CMA No.30 of 2013 in 1.A.No.91 1 of 2013 in O.S.No.161 of 20'13 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy.
Between:
M. Shiva Kumar, S/o M Laxmaiah, aged 32years,Rl/o H.No.7-155, Gonemma Basti, Patancheru town, tt/edak District
... PETITIONER (Petitioner/Plaintiffl
AND
All are residents of Mudiraj Basti, Patancheru, Medak District.
...RESPONDENTS (Respondents/Defendants)
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRPMP. NO: 1425 OF 20141
Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 R/w 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents, their henchmen, agents who are claiming through them from interfering with my enjoyment of the suit schedule property pending disposal of the main revision,
7
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY
All that proper y that is residential Plot No.6/part and ,',/part admeasuring 146 Sq. yards or 22.61 Sq. mtrs forming part of Sy.</sup> o.887 situated at Patancheru (T & tV), l4edak District.
North. N;ighborsPlot South : N rtional Highway Road East : Pot No.6/part West : Pot No.s/part
Counsel for the Petil ioner: SRI ERANKI PHANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the bllowing: ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.TO32 OF 2014 ORDER:
Heard Sri Krishna Kumar. Advocate on behalf of Sri E.Phani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. On instructions, it is submitted that the matter has become infructuous and no cause survives. While recording the submissions made by iearned counsel on behalf of revision petitioner, the revision petition is dismissed as inlructuous. In the circumstances of the case, there shali be no order as to the costs. Miscellaleous applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
IITRUECOPYII
Ass,srAN?#A$[f;l SECNONOFFICER
I
To,
;}""::"Ji,:, ;j#H:; ["::: il::::T:lh 3.TwoCDCopies gbr({-
t I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1011(12022
--:-T,\T o
c i.
:)'.r- $ln
,1t. rr
I t
ORDER
CRP.No.103 2 of 2014
DISMISSIN(; THE CIUL REVISION PE'I'ITION AS INFRCT UOUS
5 ccP(<4 +I[.f"r
M. Shiva Kumar
1. Nagasani Sri Ramulu
Nagasani Venkatesham
Nagasani Laxminarayana
A.Venkateshwara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court