The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition filed under Article 227 as infructuous since the underlying O.S. No. 155 of 2013 had already been dismissed on 31.03.2022.
Civil Revision Petition No. 378 of 2022 dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTHDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE A.ABHISHEKREDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITIONNO: 378 OF 2022
(Petition under Article 227 of the constitutionof lndia against the orders dated 19.01.2022 made in 1.A.No.1007 0t 2021 in o.S.No.1550f 20130n the file of the Court of the Family Court-Vll Additional District Judge, Medak atSanga Reddy District)
Between:
Smt.Kamala Kumari, D/o late Rudra Veeraiah, aged 47 years, Teacher, resident of H No 4-7-396' lssamia Bazar' Hyderabad
...pETITroNERipETrroNER
AND
(cause titre-amended as per court order dated og.o3.2o22in r.A.No.2 of 2022)
...RESPONDENTSiDEFENDANTS
IAN o: 10F 2022
Petition under Secti the arridav t r eo n supporto:/;: :fi :f ff ffi :j:; ffi:fl:il':,::j; further proceedings in o.S.No.155/2013 0n the fire of the Famiry court-V, Addr District Judge, Medak at Sanga Reddy.
Counsel for the petitioner : SRl. G.U.R.C. PRASAD
Counset forthe Respondent No.3: SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK IIEDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON No.378 of 2022
ORDER:
olr Learned coLlnsel for the respondents has placed record the status report, as per which, O.S.No.155of 2013 filed by the revisionpetitioner has been disn.rissed on 3t.03.2022.
Having regardto the above, the cause in the present
Civil RevisionPetition does not survivefor consideration'
Accordingly,this Civil RevisionPetition is disrnissedas
infructuous'
Miscellaneousapplications'ifanyper-rcling'slrallstand
i \
clrsed.Thereshall be no order as to costs'
Sd/.K,SAILESHI ASSISTANISEGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// sEcftfNoFFlcER
ct Judge,Medakat To, 1.7 e Judge, Family Court-Vll AdditionalDistri
S nga ReddyDistrict oPUC) 2. OneCCtoS nG.U.R .C.PrasadAdvocate ( 3.0 nECCtoSr\ Bot\aV enkateshwar RaoAdvocate(oPUC)
n 4. \ WO,,D CoPtes 5.0neSparecopy ks
I l l
HIGH COURT
ORteO:Oz tO4t2O22
ORDE R ) l CRP.N 0.378 of 2022
fii$f,"t'lcosrs
g:wt:
1HE STa r.+
o
O
27 lu[ 2fr22
l)z
.i:,
):- .a-
L
Smt. Kamala Kumari
1. Panyala Narsimha Goud
2. Bathura Prabhudas
3. Earla Devanand
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
