Dismissed

Mohd. Yunus Saleem v. Syeda Zeeshan Azhar

Telangana HC9 Jun 2022CRLRC/61/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed Criminal Revision Case No. 61 of 2018 as non-prosecuted. The petitioner failed to appear before the court at listed hearings, leading the court to conclude a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the revision was dismissed and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case dismissed for non-prosecution; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Mohd. Yunus Saleem Vs Syeda Zeeshan Azhar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANO AND TWENTY^TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH^REDDY

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION^C ASE^{NO: 61 OF20'18}

¶7

Criminal Revision Case under Sections^{397 & 401 of Cr'P.C. againstthe} Judgment made in Crl.lVP.No.1940 of^{2016 in IMCNo.328 of 2016 dated} 16.10.2017 on the file of the Court of the^{Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge} for the Trial of JHCBBC Cum Additional^{Family court cum XXlll Additional chief} Judge at Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mr. Mohammed Yunus Sateem, S/o Late^{Mohammed Ahmed, aged 35 years,} Occ - Pv.t. Servlce, Rl/o.H.No.16-10-27016161111A,^{Noor Residency First Floor,} Old Malakpet, Hyderabad

¶10

2 State of^.Telansaha, rep., by Public Prosecutor,^{*,nn.::r$#[:rffi3$5"0""}

¶11

AND

¶12

1 Sveda Zeeshan Azhar. W/o. Mohammed^{Yunus Saleem, Occ-Household,} R7o. H.No. 17-1-182t83t2, Banu Nagar, Santhosh^{Nagar, Hyderabad}

¶13

2 State of Telangana, Rep. by^{PublicProsecutor,High Court of TS and A.P.} ... Res Po n de nUPetitione r

¶14

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶15

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^praying that^{in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of^{Criminal Revision Case,the High Court} may be pleased to stay all further^{proceedings in lt4.C No.328 of 2016 on the file of} the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge^{for the Trial of JHCBBCcum Addl.} Family Court cum XXlll Additional chief Judge,^{at Hyderabadpending disposal of} the above Crl.R.C.

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD^{HABEEBUDDIN(Not Present)}

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI^{GULAM MUSTAFARABBANI (NP)}

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent No.2:^{THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (NP)}

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{A.SANTHOSH REDDY}

¶21

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.6L OF 2018

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

None represented the petitioner inspite of^listingthe matter under the caption "For dismissal"^{on 29.03.2022} ' 22.04.2022 and 28.04.2022. ll^{appears that the petitioner is} not interested to prosecute the matter.

¶24

Accordingly, the criminal Revision^{Case is dismissed for} non-prosecution. Miscellaneous^{petitionspending,} if^any, shall stand closed.

¶25

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY'

,+k sECrbN 6rrrcen

To,

'1 . The Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of JHCBBC cum -^{AdditignalFamilyCourt cumXXlll AdditionalChiefJudge at Hyderabad.} 2. One CC to Sri Mohd. Habeebuddin, Advocate IOPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Gulam Mustafa Rabbani, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies 6. One SpaqCopy gDr *'tr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0910612022

(
or) 2 [ AUE 202

ORDER

CRL.RC.No.61 of 2018

DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C FOR NON PROSECUTION B#6*

Mohd. Yunus Saleem v. Syeda Zeeshan Azhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Yunus Saleem v. Syeda Zeeshan Azhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Krishna Veni Vs State of Telangana

Smt R.Shivani and 3 Others Vs the State of A.P. and Another

Smt. R.Shivani, Hyd and 2 Othrs., Vs State of Ap., Rep. Pp and Anr.

G.Maheswar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mr. Aslam Hamid Khan and 6 Others Vs State of Ap., Rep by Its P.P and Anothers

M/S Akums Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and 3 Others Vs State of Ap.