The High Court of Telangana dismissed Criminal Petition No. 9088 of 2013 as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file fresh petition if a charge sheet was filed.
Permission accorded to withdraw the criminal petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition if charge sheet is filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAYOF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9088OF 2013
Between:
...Petitioners/Accused
AND
... ResPondents/ComPlainant
...RespondenUDefactoComplainant
Petition under section482 of cr.P.cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminal Petition,the High court may be pleased toquash theproceedings in crimeNo. 394 o1 2012of Police Station, Uppal, in so far as thepetitioners are concerned.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLPMP.NO: 8509 OF 2013)
Petition under section482 ofcr.P.c prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Nlemorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition,the High court may be pleased to stay allfurther proceedings in crime No. 394 ot 2012 of Police Station, Uppal, includingtheir arrest, insofar as the petitioners areconcerned'
l.A. NO: IOF 2016(CRLPMP' NO: 18977 OF 20'16)
/
""*"?l; State of relangana,representedby the Public Prosecutor'High court'at Hyderabad
...Petitioners/Accused
AND
"'ResPondents/Accused
(R-4 is not necessary Party)
"'Com Plainant/ResPondent
Petitionunder Section482 of Cr'PC praying that in the circumstances statedin the Memorandumof Groundsof CriminalPetition' the High Court may bepleased to vacate the interim stay granted in Crl P No 9088 of 2013 on the file of the HighCourt, dated lg'11 2013'
This Petitioncoming on for hearing'upon perusingthe Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri Nandigam KrishnaRao, Advocatefor the Petitionerand the Public Prosecutoron behalf of the RespondentNo'1 and of Sri K' Pradeep Reddy' Advocate for the Respondent N o.2.
The Gourtmadethe following:ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9O88 OF 2()13
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Petition with liberty to file fresh petition, in case, if charge sheet is filed in Cr.No.394 of 2Ol2 of Uppal Police Station and a letter dated 01.06.2022 u,as filed in the Registrv to that effect.
Pcrmission is accorded.
In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition, in case, if charge sheet is filed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stald closed.
\
SDIK.AMMAJI ASSISTAUT REGISTRAR //TRUE copy// __l:!..crloN oFFlcER To, 1 2 The tll Metropolitan Magistrate, cyberabad, "t L.B. Nagars
SW
x\l"r
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/06/2022
ORDER
1 v- S TA Ie:
q
ooJ 0 g J uil 2UZz
* I
DES FAT
CRLP.No.9088 ol 2013
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN
Smt. R. Shivani
R. Venugopal
Dr. Jayadheer Tirumala Rao
The State of Telangana
P. Rama Raiu Yadav
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
