Allowed

Smt R.Shivani and 3 Others v. the State of A.P. and Another

Telangana HC8 Jun 2022CRLP/9094/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana granted permission to withdraw a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The withdrawal was permitted with a liberty to file a fresh petition if a charge sheet was subsequently filed. Pending miscellaneous petitions were stood closed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition with liberty to file a fresh petition if a charge sheet is filed; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Smt R.Shivani and 3 Others Vs the State of A.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{A.SANTHOSHREDDY}

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITI NN : 9094 OF 2 13

¶6

Between:

¶7

Smt R.Shivani,^{W/o.SriR.Venugopal,} .Oc^c:Business'^{Rl/o .Flat No'402'}

¶8

6'h;r.,;;A; Aiuttrintt,-ortgioii^{D;thmukh colonv' HYderabad'}

¶9

R.Venusopar,^s/o. ,Sri +:nX.ml $:"rr:',fifr%'"';ufu?.^{t'" No 402' Gharonda} Apartments,^Durgabatt-

¶10

'^{gililltl l E, [;:#'ffi ;r:lax ixl,lil' 33i,? ?tT;#3v'' ": ::1T,} 4 J Aditya,,^{s/o orJ rrru"#illl,'!;gil'g1fi:;#;; t'" No 402'Gharond:}

¶11

Apartments,DurgabatuesrrrrruNrrvvrvri.,'

¶12

...'ETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶13

AND

¶14

Hish^{court of Andhra}

¶15

bv its^Pubric

¶16

., :":":t"'' ;r0"..-r,lJ,=n?L[**"0 3 *3f"^{5 :"J:i .'' R/ o H No 2' 1'6 e'}

¶17

'^{y,:;,',tffJ,t 3[f 'S, }:i?['ff}

¶18

."RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶19

;s!l-"Jd'r?

¶20

.,"01,:'lltt"'#ii"i{.,ffi t =,n n "ii*:Jt,i*}'l':ii#dlif e^{r s a rec o n c e rne u} "r 5:i:,'""3"tt^{l ll} "^{;" in' "}

¶21

20¹⁵ CRLP M P. NO 47 90^o

¶22

Betw^een High^{Court of Andhra} F A.P^{, Rep} '^{by its Public Prosecutor'} erabad J,:5JT:IEfi ....PETITIONERIRESPONDENT

¶23

....PETITIONERIRESPONDENT

¶24

AND

¶25

-=-

¶26

Smt R.Shivani, W/o.Sri R.Venugopal, Occ:Business, Rl/o. FIat No.402, Gharonda Apartments, Durgabai Deshmukh Colony, HYderabad.

¶27

¶28

R.Venugopal, S/o. Sri B.Nagaraj, Occ:Business, Rl/o. Flat No.402, Gharonda Apartments, Durgabai Deshmukh Colony, Hyderabad.

¶29

Dr.J.Tirumala Rao,, S/o. R. narayanaswamy, Occ:Doctor, R/o. Flat No.4O2, Gharonda Apartments, Durgabai-Deshmukh Colony, Hyderabad.

¶30

J.Aditya,, S/o-. Dr.J.Tirumal Rao, Occ:Business, F/o. Flat No.402, Gharonda Apartments, Durgabai Deshmukh corony, Hyderabad. Responoenilnicuseo"'

¶31

M.Padmakar Reddv. S/o tr4.Aryi Reddy, Occ:Business R/o.H.No.2-1_69, Laxma Reddy Cotohy, uppal, danga ii"a-ov oi.tiii

¶32

...COMPLAINANTiRESPONDENT

¶33

Petition under section .482 0't cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorand,m of .Ground. "f 6rilrrr.i ,petition,the High Court may ;,: :'i,XTflJ; ffi'fil;Jl""I;;"Jfl;EiSflffi i'li3, , *, noio'"i'io-,'s""'" ,n"

¶34

CR LPMP. NO: 851 2 OF 2013

¶35

i',ff$ :{",?*fffi sf,HlH :ifu'#:ffi i *{ #y" #"r [1r

¶36

This^petition comi ^ ,i1,"fr";1ii#ffi^{,Trh*+l,'i1*;n:ft} f ;,r'}d

¶37

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶38

¶39

HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY}

¶40

CRIMINAL PETITION^{N0.9094 0F 2013}

¶41

ORDER:

¶42

Learned counsel^{for the petitionersseekspermission} of this Court to^{withdraw the Criminal Petition with liberty} to file fresh^{petition, in case, if charge sheet is filed in} Cr.No.455 of 2Ol2^{of Uppal PoiiceStation and a letter} dated 01.06.2022^{was filed in the Registryto that effect'}

¶43

Permission is^accorded.

¶44

In the result, the^{Criminal Petition is dismissedas} withdrawn with liberty^{to file fresh petition, in case, if}

¶45

chargesheetisfiled.Miscelianeouspetitionspending,if

¶46

any, shall stand^closed.

¶47

SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANJ^REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY' seJrrtH^oFFlcER

¶48

To,

¶49

The^{lll MetropolitanMagistrate ' Cyberabad at L BNagar' Ranga Reddy'}

¶50

The^{Station HouseOfficer'Uppal Police Station ' Cyberabad'} Hlgh^{Court for the State of Telangana'at}

¶51

j Two CCs to Public "t"t*or Hyderabad^{[OU ll}

¶52

One^{CC to SRI' NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO AdvocateiOPUCI}

¶53

6 Two CD^CoPies

¶54

on"^SpareCoPY MMA$\v

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810612022

ORDER

CRLP.No.9094 of 2013

1 H S T4 16:
oo 0 I j lt U ll ?w? !
*
DEii
PA{Q

¶60

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶61

AS WITHDRAWN

¶62

q<br>

Smt R.Shivani and 3 Others v. the State of A.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt R.Shivani and 3 Others v. the State of A.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Srinivasa Raju Vs state of telangana

R.Purushothama Chary, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

G.v.Laxmikantha Rao, Karimnagar (Manddt) and 2 Othrs., Vs State of Ap., Rep. Sho, 1 Town Ps., and Anr.

K. Krishna Veni Vs State of Telangana

Smt. R.Shivani, Hyd and 2 Othrs., Vs State of Ap., Rep. Pp and Anr.

Sri Gul Merani Vs The State of Telangana and another