This court dismissed three criminal revision cases as infructuous because the underlying miscellaneous case was pending. The trial court was directed to dispose of the main case within four months.
Revision cases dismissed; Trial Court directed to dispose of M.C.No.12 of 2016 within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
` HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos. 140, 144 and 145 OF 2019
COMMON ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the trial Court is taking-up the matter for trial in main M.C.No.12 of 2016 in which the impugned orders in these revisions were passed. He further submits that since the M.C. proceedings are in progress and the M.C. is posted on 29.07.2022, the matters have become infructuous. He further requested that the revision cases may be dismissed by giving direction to the trial Court to dispose of M.C.12 of 2016 as expeditiously as possible.
The first respondent-party-in-person called present.
While recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, these Criminal Revision Cases are dismissed as infructuous. However, the trial Court is directed dispose of M.C.No.12 of 2016, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Miscellaneous petitions,
if any, pending in these Criminal Revision cases, shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
18.07.2022 Nvl
Petitioner
First Respondent
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
