T.G.K.Murthy v. State of Telangana rep,pp
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 70 oF 2018
Crl.Revision Case Under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated'14-07-2017 in M.C. No. 214 ot 2004 on the file of the Court of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of JGCBBC -CumAdditional Family Court , Hyderabad
Between:
T.G.K.Murthy, S/o. Late T. Rama Rao, Hindu, age 64 years, R/o1-8-40-/1 North Kamal Nagar, ECIL ., Hyderabad. ,.. REVISION PETITIONERY Respondent
AND
..RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C- praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of the operation of the orders passed in in M.C.No. 214 of 2004 o^ the file of the Addl. Metropolrtan Sessions Judge for the Trial of JHCBBC -cumAddl. Family Court at Hyderabad, dl: 14-07-2017.
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavlt filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to file the material papers as additional Material Papers in Crl.RC.No. 70 ol 2018 and receive the same in the interest of justice.
f-I
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G. RAMA SARMA ( not beingpresent) Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 :THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(TS) Counsel forthe Respondent No. 2 :SRl G. ESWARAIAH
Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 : --
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.70 OF 201E ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is fiied by petitioner/husband aggrieved by the order, dated 14.07.2017, allowing M.C.No.214 of 2Q04 by the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of JHCBBC-cum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad
As per the docket proceedings, on 07.04.2022 as there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed on 08.06.2022. On 08.06.2022 also, there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed on 17.06.2022 under the caption "For dismissal". Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner despite listing the matter under the caption "For dismissal". It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Therefore, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending, shall stand closed.
Sd/.A.V.S.S. C.S.M. SARMA DEPUry BEEISTRAR //TRUE COPY' /W To SECTI6T OFFICER 1. The Additional Metroool ;ig"6iTqffi#[r].ihTl:rinii?#;{Tlfli#:i,tri,i[,i::.,
I
l
I
i
I
I
i, ff : Ei,[j:[t ? sx# ;f HAxYs?aEi3f, ", 6. One Spare Copy \M
.
HIGH COURT
DATED:1710612022
ORDER
,-,i }-t...
.t
tr 1[ []s ?[11
,.9
,l: .':
CRLRC.No.70 of 2018
DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C. FOR NON PROSECUTION
wra
\7
T.G.K. Murthy
State Of Telangana
T. Vijaya Lakshmi
T. Rajyalakshmi
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court