Dismissed

V. Subash Chandra Bose v. M/s. Bijay Finance and Investments Pvt., Ltd. and another

Telangana HC14 Sept 2022CRLP/486/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash an order and reopen proceedings, ruling that the petition was infructuous because the trial court had already disposed of the main criminal case via Lok Adalat settlement.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was dismissed as being infructuous because the main case had been disposed of.

V. Subash Chandra Bose Vs M/s. Bijay Finance and… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEI,{BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 486 OF 2020

¶6

Between:

¶7

V. Subash Chandra Bose, S/o. Sri Mohan Rao, Occ.Business, aged about⁴⁸ years, Rl/o. H.No.389, Anjaneyanagar, Hyderabad

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 . M/s. Bijay Finance and lnvestments Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Mr.N.lVl.Ramesh S/o. N.Manikyam, Plot No.2,^tVladhupala Enclave,^Akar Road, Bowenpally, Secunderabad.

¶11

The State of Telangana., Represented by PP, High Court,^Hyderabad.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,^{the HighCourt may be} pleased to quash the Order dated 06.01.02020 passed by the learned XVI Addl. Judge Cum XX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,^{Secunderabadpassedin} Crl.MP.No.3414 ot 2019 in CC No.1216 of^2O1B and direct^{the learned XVI Addl.} Judge Cum XX Addl. Chief Metropolitan^{Magistrate Secunderabadto reopen} CC No.'1216 ol 2018 for adducing the defense^{evidence by the petitioner in the} interest of^justice.

¶14

LA. NO: 1OF 2O2O

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that^{in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of CriminalPetition, the HighCourt may be} pleased to stay of all further proceedings in CC No. 1216 12018 on the file of the Hon'ble XVI Addl. Judge Cum XX Addl.^{Chief MetropolitanMagistrate} Secunderabad.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and none appeared for the Petitioner.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

THE HON'BLE^{DR. JUSTICED.NAGARJUN}

¶19

CRIMINAL PETI^{TION No.486 of2O2O}

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

This Criminal^{Petition is filed under Section 482 of the} Code of Criminal^{Procedure by the petitionerchallengingthe} orders dated^{06.0l.2O2OinCrl'M'P'No'34I4of2019in} C.C.No.1216 of^{2018 passedby the learnedXVI Additional} Judge - cum -^{XX Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate'} Secunderabad,^{wherein tJle petition liled by the petitioner under} Section 311 of^{the Code of Criminal Procedure was dismissed'}

¶22

2 There is no^{representation on behalf of petitioner-accused} No. 1.

¶23

l,earned Assistant^{Public Prosecutorhas submittedthat} subsequent to^{filing of the criminal petition, the trial Courthas} disposed of the^{case on O8.O2.2O20,-as the partiesto the} dispute have^{settled the disputebefore Lok Adalat and to that} extent the^{proceedings sheet downloaded frome-courts is filed'}

¶24

In view of the^{above submission, since the main case itself} has been disposed^{of, the very pulposeof frlingthe criminal} petition to quash^{orders dated 06'0l} '2O2O^{in Crl'M'P'No '3414of} 2019 in C.C.No.^{12 16 of 2018passedby the learned XVI}

¶25

¶26

¶27

Additional Judgc - cum - XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate , Secunderabad is deleated and thereby the criminal petition has become infructuous and liable to be dismissed.

¶28

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶29

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶30

SDIK.ONESIM DEPUTYREGISTRAR //TRUE COpy// t ",t^.-,,r.\rr ' t* SECTION OFFICER

¶31

To,

¶32

'l . The XVI Additional Judge cum XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.

¶33

?. 9ne^{CC to Sri Deepak Misra,Advocate} [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court forthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies

¶34

One Spare Copy gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1410912022

I -tL
*
9
(, o
tr,
J-
(ir
I ss
Il-U(.
() s
o
(r *'

¶39

ORDER

¶40

CRLP.No.486 of 2020

¶41

DISMISSING THE CRL.P AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶42

GI
-/
1>

V. Subash Chandra Bose v. M/s. Bijay Finance and Investments Pvt., Ltd. and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Subash Chandra Bose v. M/s. Bijay Finance and Investments Pvt., Ltd. and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punna Vijay Kumar Vs Punna Mamatha

Veerapureddygari Bharath Krishna Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. B.Vishwa Sree Vs Y.Sravanthi and Another

Mulley Nikhil Vs State of Telangana and another

Sri Ayyawar Madhusudhan Vs Smt. Vakulabharanam Shivashruthi

P. Lingappa Vs The State of Telangana and another