The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings under Section 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, as the main case had already been disposed of via a mutual settlement before the T.K. Adalath.
The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[325s I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMIN AL PETITION NO: 1 3 0F 2020
Between:
Petitioners 2 & 3 are residents of H.No .'18-1795 / 1, Hanumanpet, Miryalguda, Nalgonda District.
AND
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1 to3
...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANTS
...RESPONDENT
petition under Section 492 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in c.c.No.395 of 2019 on the file of ll Additionat Judiciat First Class Magistrate, Suryapet.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P PRABHAKAR REDDy,Advocate for the petitioner and of the Additional Pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.2 and of None Appeared for the Respondent No..l
The Court made the fo owing: ORDER
( (
THE HON'BLEDR. JUSTICED.NAGARJUN
CRIMINALPETITIONNo.13 of2O2O
ORDER:
This CriminalPetition is liled under Section 482 of the Code of CriminalProcedureby the petitioners - accusedNos'1 to 3 toquash C.C.No.395of 20 19 on the file of learnedII Additional JudicialFirst Class Magistrate' Suryapet, the cognizance of'which was taken for the offenceunder Sections 498-A of the IndianPenal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry ProhibitionAct.
2
and thereby the criminal petition has become infructuous and
liable to be dismissed.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.K.ONESIM
t
DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
sEcrlof fFFrcER
To,
_Telangana at Hyderabad.[OUT]
SB
k.$..
HIGH COURT
DATED:1310912022
ORDER
/2-
1H STA T€
't
/t
,5o 2 6 0E[ ?02?
; 2 ;l
-\ '/
CRLP.No.13 of 2020
DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUTCUOUS WITHOUT COSTS q'rr.>z A{Y
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant warrant of quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
N/AReferred
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Vijay Kumar
Punna Krishnaiah
Punna Rameshwari
Punna Paramatha
State of Telangana
Dr. Justice D.Nagarjun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
