Dismissed

B. Venkat Reddy and 2 others v. the State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC12 Sept 2022CRLP/3422/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, the High Court of Telangana was asked to quash proceedings on grounds of untenable allegations. The Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the charge sheet has been laid, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition allowing liberty for a fresh petition if the cause survives.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Petition was dismissed as infructuous, granting liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh petition.

B. Venkat Reddy and 2 others Vs the State of Telangana… — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^320e 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENIY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3422 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

'l . B. VENKAT REDDY, S/o.Late B. Narsimha Reddy, aged about 55 years, Occ. Ex-Sarpanch, Fl,/o.H.No.'1-6, Ramanthapur Village, Shankarpally lvlandal, R.R. District.

¶9

GUDATI AMARENDER REDDY @ BOJI REDDY, S/o.Kamal Reddy, aged about 36 years, Occ. Real Estate Business, Rl/o.Elavarthy Village, Shankarpalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

M. SRIKANTH REDDY, S/o.Vema Reddy, aged about 36 years, Occ. Busniness, R/o.Masaniguda, Shankarpalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶11

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 3 to 5

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, at Hyderabad

¶14

PATLOLLAANANTHA REDDY, S/o.P. Malla Reddy, aged about 68 years, Occ. Retd Employee, Ri./o. Flat No.307, Vishnavi Premidis, Jubilee Enclave, Madhapur, Ranga Reddy District.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FlR.No.1'l 5 of 2021 on the file of P.S. Shankerpalli, Cyberabad for the offence under sections 447, 420,307, 506 R/w.34 IPC against Petitioner/Accused Nos.3 to 5 as the same is untenable either on facts or under law.

¶17

l.A. NO: 1OF 2021

¶18

¶19

Petition under {lection 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Mernorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in FlR.No.1'l ti of 2O21 on the file of P.S. Shankerpalli, Cyb,arabad for the offence under sections 447,420,307, 506 Rl/w.34 IPC inck-ding a.rr:st o1' Petitioners/Accused Nos.:l to 5 pending disposal of the main Crimine I Petiticn.

¶20

This Petit on corr ng on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Oriminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J. Govardharr Redcly, Advlcate for the Petitioners and of the Assistant Public Prosecutor on rehalf cf ther Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.i2.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

1 ii

¶23

THE HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No-3422 OF 2O2L

¶24

ORDER:-

¶25

1 . The present Criminal Petition is liled seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners in Crime No.115 of 2O2l of Shankerpalli Police Station, Cyberabad District

¶26

No representation on petitioners' side on call.

¶27

l,earned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that charge sheet is laid and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶28

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh petition in case the cause survives

¶29

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand

¶30

SD/. T.JAYASREE closed. ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (,'1n - SECTION OFFICER

¶31

To,

¶32

'l . The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District'

¶33

The Station House Officer,^{P.S. Shankerpalli, Ranga Reddy District.}

¶34

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor,^{High Court for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶35

One CC to Sri J. Govardhan^{Reddy, Advocate} IOPUCI

¶36

Two CD Copies

t GJ $=

i I I I I I i

HIGH COI,'RT

DATE D : 1',r-l 09 I 2022'.

¶41

,1
, .a 1gL STATE
.')\ili
t
L. xI $t$11 4 I

ORDER

CRLP.No.3422 of 2021

DISMISSING THE CRL.P

AS INFRU.CTUOUS

@&*

B. Venkat Reddy and 2 others v. the State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B. Venkat Reddy and 2 others v. the State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jankuta Venkateswarlu Vs State of Telangana

Yadala Marianna, And Another Vs State of Telangana, And Another

K.Krishna Vs The State of Telanagana

M. Srikanth Vs The State of Telangana

M. Srikanth , Srikanth Sharma Vs The State of Telangana

Patlolla Chandrasekhar Reddy Vs the State of Telangana