Dismissed

Jankuta Venkateswarlu v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Sept 2022CRLP/1644/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner appealed for quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Learning Public Prosecutor submitted case was referred for lack of evidence rendering petition infructuous. Court recorded submission and dismissed petition without hearing petitioner's side.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No. 1644 of 2021 seeking quash of proceedings is dismissed; no further proceedings recorded.

Jankuta Venkateswarlu Vs State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^320e ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD}

¶3

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1644 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Jankuta Venkateswarlu, S/o. Dharmaiah,^(A2)

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

'1. State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶12

K. Yadagiri, s/o. Syilu, r/o. Gollakunta village, Akkannapeta Mandal, Siddipeta District. occ.Agriculture, age.54 years.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records^pertaining to FIR No.193/2020 dt 31-12-2020^ol P.S. Akkannapet, Siddipet District and^quash the same in respect of Petitioner/Accused No.2, in the interest of^justice.

¶15

l.A. NO: 1OF 2021

¶16

Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner/A2 in FIR No.'193/2020 d1.31-12-2020 of P.S Akkannapet, Siddipet District, in the interest of^justice.

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri CHETLURU SREENIVAS ,Advocate for the Petitioner (not being^present) and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶18

The Court made the following: OROER

¶19

THE HON'BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1644 OF 2O2l

¶20

ORDER:-

¶21

1 . The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.193 of 2O2O of Akkannapet Police Station, Siddipet District

¶22

No representation on petitioner's side on cal1.

¶23

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on uritten instructions, sr-rbmits that the case has been referred as lack of evidence' and thus, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶24

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

¶25

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand

¶26

Sd/. T.SRINIVAS closed DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

a-,

SEGTION OFFICER

1 . The Principal Judicial First Class Maqistrate at Husnabad.

¶32

The Station House Officer, Akkannafet police Station, Siddipet.

¶33

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Tetangana tourJ

¶34

One CC to Chetluru Sreenivas, Advocate tOpUCI

¶35

Two C.D. Copies.

A-4 [,RC

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810912022

ORDER

.< gLAIL
o'
,
lt,
s
.c-) (J
(na
iri
a
-i/ <br>.t
oc t.t

¶41

CRLP.No.1644 of 2021

¶42

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶43

%," a)

Jankuta Venkateswarlu v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jankuta Venkateswarlu v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmi PrameelaKatari Vs The State of Telangana

Saritha Fulmamidker Vs The State of Telangana

Thatireddy Ashok Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Yadala Marianna, And Another Vs State of Telangana, And Another

K.Krishna Vs The State of Telanagana

Dasari Balaiah Vs The State of Telangana