Dismissed

Patlolla Chandrasekhar Reddy v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Sept 2022CRLP/3102/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed seeking quashing of FIR numbers, the petitioner sought quashing of proceedings due to untenability on facts or law. The Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the case was referred for lack of evidence, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous.

Patlolla Chandrasekhar Reddy Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

[^320s ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3102 OF 2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

'l . Patlolla Chandrasekhar Reddy, S/o.P. Malla Reddy, aged about 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, FUo.H.No.34, Ramanthapur Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

Sai Reddy, S/o.P. Chandrasekhar Reddy, aged about 26 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o.H.No.34, Ramanthapur Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶11

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.1 to 3

¶12

AND

¶13

'l . The State of Telangana, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, at Hyderabad.

¶14

Patlolla Anantha Reddy, S/o.P. Malla Reddy, aged about 68 years, Occ. Retd Employee, Ri/o.Flat No.307, Vishnavi Premidis, Jubilee Enclave, Madhapur, Ranga Reddy District.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of CI.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FlR.No.115 of 2021 on the file of P.S. Shankerpalli, Cyberabad for the offence under sections 447, 420, 307, 506 RJw.34 against Petitioner/Accused Nos.1 and 2 as the same is untenable either on facts or under law.

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all fu(her proceedings in FlR.No.l15 of 2021 on the file of P.S.

¶19

Shankerpalli, Cyberat ad for the offence under sections 447, 4.20,3Ct7, 506 Ri/w.34 IPC including arrest^{( f} Petitioners/Accused N.1 & 2^pending rlisposal of the main Criminal Petition.

¶20

This Petition c >ming on for hearing, upon perusing tlre Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal I etition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J. Govardhan Reddy, Advo,:ate for he Petitioner arrd the Assistant Pub i<: Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the llespon( 3nt No.1 and none appeared for the Fes:onde,nt No.2.

¶21

The Court m;rde the rllowing: ORDER

¶22

THE HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.31O2 OF 2O2T

¶23

ORDER:-

¶24

The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners in Crime No.l 15 of 2O2l of Shankerpalli Police Station, Cyberabad District.

¶25

No representation on petitioners' side on ca-11.

¶26

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that the case has been referred as lack of evidence' and thus, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶27

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

¶28

Miscellaleous petitions, if any pending, shall stand

¶29

closed.

¶30

sD/-P'PADMANABRET,EFRRX //rRUEcoPY// (u't.r \trIri sECTtoN^orrtcrR

¶31

To lll:*ilii,li"55::""m?"xl:'Ji%?f"[:l;jft^{:Eiisi'[""5]{H;5'H"oo'} : ?*ks Jii^{l i} ff,ffi^{BH:l"tx?li't1"3""11? ts'iH$'"'" or rer a n gan a at} Hvderabad^{[OU I I} 5. Two^CDCoPtes

gbr

HIGH Ctf,URl

DATED: 1210tt12022

.-4
,a '< - L ST €
i r- ' o
(i' ,i<br>l<br>)
a 4 l[:l
l

¶36

ORDER

¶37

CRL.P.ttlo .311 2 of 2021

¶38

w
Atu

¶39

DISMISS|ING^"HE CRL.P AS INFRUCTI^IOUS

Patlolla Chandrasekhar Reddy v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Patlolla Chandrasekhar Reddy v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jankuta Venkateswarlu Vs State of Telangana

Yadala Marianna, And Another Vs State of Telangana, And Another

K.Krishna Vs The State of Telanagana

M. Srikanth Vs The State of Telangana

M. Srikanth , Srikanth Sharma Vs The State of Telangana

B. Venkat Reddy and 2 others Vs the State of Telangana and another