Dismissed

Salam Hambi Salam Bin Badar A1 Hamdi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Aug 2022CRLP/2971/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hearing a Criminal PETition under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR, the court found the petitioner was absent and the responding prosecutor did not file written instructions but appeared on behalf of the State. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; liberty granted to file fresh application if cause survives.

Salam Hambi Salam Bin Badar A1 Hamdi Vs The State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

1 THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2971 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Salam Hambi @ Salam Bin Badar 41 Hamdi, S/o Badar Bin Omer Al Hamdi, Aged abt. 33 years, Occ. Business, Ryo.10-65/2, Bismilla Colony, Shaheen Nagar, Balanagar, Rangareddy, TS

¶8

.,.PETITIONERYACCUSED NO.2

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Building, Hyderabad, Dist

¶11

Abdul Hassain Ali, S/o late Mohd Hussian, Aged abt 54 years, Occ. lnam in Masjid' Fr/o e-4 -1 37 t 1 B' -""'n":Ht![8l,tEfl r,o.ro"ro coMp LAr NANr

¶12

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the FIR No.595/2020 on Petitioner/Accused No.2, dated 09.12.2O2O by the P.S. Chand rayangutta, on the file of Hon'ble Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally. Hyderabad Dist., Under the offences Uls 427, 447, 468, 471, 420 Nw 34 IPC at registered by calling the entire records

¶13

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2021

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including not to arrest the petitioner /A2 in FIR No.595/2020 UIS 427, 447, 468, 471, 42O rlw 34 IPC of P S Chadrayangutta Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Crl.P.

¶15

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A.RAM MOHAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Assistant Public Prosecutor^(TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶17

THE HON' ILE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUIIALATHA CR MINAL PETITION No.297L^()F iloil 1

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

Seeking to quash the proceedings that are initiated against the petitioner through FIR No. 595 of 2O2O ol Chandrayang Lrtta Police Station, Hyderabad [)istrict, the present Crim na1 Petition is fi1ed

¶20

No rep: esentation on petitioner's sicle on r:a11. On the other hand, he learned Assistant Public Prose'cutor submits, on written i rstructions, that the charge: sh eer. is laid on completion o^- investigation, and hence, the C:-irrrinal Petition has become efructuous.

¶21

Therefi. re, this Criminal Petition is dism:.ssed granting liberty to t le petitioner/Accused No.2 to rnr)ve a fresh application, n case the cause suryives.

¶22

As a s< quel, pending Miscellaneous Applit:ations, if any, sha-ll stand r losed.

¶23

Sd/-K.AMI,{AJI ASSIS]TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII ', 1-Y, .\ L :iECTION OFFICER

¶24

To 1. The Chief Me ropolitan lvlagistrate, Nampally, Hyderaba'J.

¶25

The Station H >use Officer, Chandrayangutta Police Station, Hyderabad City. 3. Two CCs to tl e Public Prosecutor (TS), High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶26

One CC to Sr A.Ram Mohan Goud, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copi rs 6. One Spare C,^py Kj. \x'\

HIGH COURT

DATED:11 10812022

'-'5;Eh.<br>

ORDER

CRLP.No.2971 ot lLt 21

¶32

CRL.P. lS DISMIS!: ::D.

¶33

oV)'

Salam Hambi Salam Bin Badar A1 Hamdi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salam Hambi Salam Bin Badar A1 Hamdi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Katagowni Shiva Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Banothu Venkatesh Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Bhukya Venu , Guguloth Venu Gopal Vs The State of Telangana

Kontham Srikanth Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and another

Salam Hambi , Salam Bin Badar Al Hamdi Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Gaddala Vijay Kumar and 2 others Vs The State of Telangana and another