The High Court dismissed a criminal petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings because a charge sheet had already been filed and the accused were convicted, rendering the petition infructuous.
Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous due to filing of charge sheet and subsequent conviction of accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2799 OF 2021
Between:
...Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3
AND
...Respondent
...ResiondenUDe-facto Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in connection with the case in Cr. No. 72 of 2021 on the file of the Police Station Burgampahad, Bhadradri Kothagudem District and quash the same by allowing the above petition in respect of the petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 herein.
l.A- NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in connection with the Cr. No.72 of 2021 on the file of the Police Station Burgampahad, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition.
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the police to strictly follow the procedure under section 41-A of Cr.P.C and also the guidelines held by the Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar/Judgment reported in 2O14 (8) SCC 273. since all the alleged offence is punishable below Seven years.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri lvlummaneni Srinivasa Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of the Respondent No.2 not appearing in person or by Advocate.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2799 OF 2O2l
ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are initiated against the petitioners through F.I.R. No. 72 of 2021 of Burgampahad Police Station, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.
SD/-G.SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
I
SECTION OFFICER
To,
$1>
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110812O22
ORDER
CRLP.No.2799 of 2021
E S fA7'{:
<br>o
g 21 t:'l'l ?[A i<br>
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
x
Gaddala Vrjay Kumar and others
State of Telangana
Chillakur Sumalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
