High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the charge sheet was laid in the quash petition, following an ex-parte hearing where the petitioner's counsel was absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2549 OF 2022
Between:
...Petitioners/Accused
AND
...ResondenUState
...RespondenUDefacto-Complainant
Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records andquash.the proceedings against the petitioners in Crime No. 8 of 2022 P.S. Saifabad, Hyderabad.District, for the offencepunishable Under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of lPC.
I
l.A. NO: 2OF 2022
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceedings including the appearance/arrest of the petitioner in Crime No B of 2020 P.S. Saifabad, Hyderabad District, for the offence punishable Under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of lPC, pending disposal of quash petition.
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2022
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead Defacto Complainant as Respondent No.2 in the above criminal petition to the array of respondents or to pass necessary order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, in the interests ofjustice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Jalib Hasan, Advocate for the Petitioner not being present and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2549 of 2022
ORDER:
,
L
To,
shall stand closed.
SD/- K. SHYLESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// lir. SECTION OFFICER
/
V
HIGH COURT
Dr. CSL, J
DATED:0311112022
ORDER
CRLP.No.2549 of 2022
STATF
1
.e
/ (
sEt Nltt o
1t
t
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
TKht'
Arshia Fatima, Shaik Ahmed
The State of Telangana
Rehana Begum
Dr. Justice Chillakur Sumalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
