Dismissed

Chintapandu Naveen Kumar , Teenmar Mallanna v. The State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC3 Nov 2022CRLP/2342/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings for offences under Sections 504, 506 IPC and SC/ST POA Act. The Court held the petition infructuous as the charge sheet had already been laid, granting liberty to file a fresh petition if the cause survives.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Petition was dismissed; liberty granted to file a fresh petition if the cause survives.

Chintapandu Naveen Kumar , Teenmar Mallanna Vs… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2342 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Chintapandu Naveen Kumar @ Teenmar lvlallanna, S/o. Bagaiah,^Aged about^{37 years,} Occ. Reporter R/o. H.No. 1-37 nH, Raghavendranagar, Peerzadiguda, R.R.District,^n/o H.No. 2-79 Madhapur village, Turkapally lvlandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri^District.

¶8

..PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

1 . The State of Telangana, through S.H.O., Addaguduru Police Station,^Rachakonda Commissionerate, R.R. Diskict. Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, At Hyderabad.

¶11

Chippalapally lrilahendranadh, S/o. Bhagavantham, Aged 36^years, Occ:^Business, R/o D.Repaka village Addagudur Mandal, Rachakonda.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the N,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^{pleased to} quash the Proceedings in F.l.R. No. 24 of 2021 on the file of the Addaguduru Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, for the alleged offence U/Sec.^{504, 506} of^l.P.C. and Sec. 3(l)(r)(u) and 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST POA Act, 2015. Against the^{Petitionerand} grant such other relief.

¶14

l.A. NO: 1 : 2342 OF 2022

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^{pleased to} grant stay of fu(her proceedings F.l.R. No. 24 of 2021 on the file of the Addaguduru Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate,RR district for the alleged offence Uisec. s04, 506 of l.P.C. and Sec. 3(t)(r)(u) & 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST POA Act, 2015.^Against the Petitioner and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the clrcumstances of the case-

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri GANAPURAI/ CHANDRA SEKHAR. Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of^the Respondent No.R1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No. R2.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶19

CRIMINAL PETITION No.2342 of 2022

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

The present Criminal petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that a_re pending against the petitioner in Crime No.24 of 2O2l of Addaguduru police Station, Rachakonda.

¶22

No representation on petitioner,s side on call.

¶23

Learned Assistant Public prosecutor, submits, on written instructions, that charge sheet is laid and

¶24

therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶25

Recording the said submission, the Criminal petition

¶26

is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to move a

¶27

fresh petition in case the cause survives.

¶28

As a sequel, miscellaneous petition-s pending, if any, shall stand closed.

To,

//TRUE COPY//

The Judicial Magistrate I Class at Alair

¶33

sdlADMANABHA REDDY SISTANT REGISTRAR

¶34

SEcTIoN'6iFIcER

¶35

¶36

The Station House Officer. addaguduru, police Staion, Rachakonda uommtssionarate. Ranga Reddy.

¶37

Two CC's to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana Hyderabad [OUT]

¶38

One CC ro Sri CHANDRA SEKHAR GANApURAMU Advocate [OPUC]

¶39

Two CD Copies

,r&-

HIGH COURT

Dr. CSL, J

DATED:0311112022

L AI'E <br>v
o 1 2 IJtntr ?[rt }l
q
r S
-j::
v'q

¶45

ORDER

¶46

CRLP.No.2342 of 2022

¶47

CRIMINAI, PT]TI'IION IS DISMISSI]D

¶48

)
I

Chintapandu Naveen Kumar , Teenmar Mallanna v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chintapandu Naveen Kumar , Teenmar Mallanna v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Burju Sudhakar Reddy Vs Vadla Balraj

Burju Sudhakar Reddy Vs B. Parthasaradhi

Smt. Qamer Banu Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd Majeed. Khan and another Vs State of Telangana

Mohammed Manzoorus Salam Vs The State of Telangana

Arshia Fatima and Another Vs The State of T.S. and Another