Dismissed

Smt. Petluru Vasundara Devi and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC5 Dec 2022CRLP/1930/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings against accused as infructuous because the police had already filed a charge sheet. Petitioners were allowed to move for quashing the charge sheet later.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; petitioners allowed to seek quashment of charge sheet.

Smt. Petluru Vasundara Devi and 2 others Vs The State… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1930 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Smt. Petluru Vasundara Devi , w/o.Late. P. Guruswamr Reddy, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o. Palugodu, Dakkilimandalam, Nellore District.

¶8

Smt. P. Jalaja, w/o. Sri. P. Ashok Goud, Aged 60 years, Occ. Housewife. Fl/o. 4-93, Chandanagar, Serilingampally Mandal and N,tlu nicipality, Ranga Reddy District.

¶9

Sri.P. Ashok Goud, S/o. Late. Sri. P.Rama Kistaiah, Aged 70 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o.4-93, Chandanagar, Serilingampally lt4andal and IVunicipality, Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

...Petitioner/Accused No.1 to 3

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana , Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶13

Smt. Shailaja Krishna, w/o. Sri. M.Radha Krishna, Aged 57 years, Occ. Not known, Rl/o. H.No.^'16-1 1-741lD/56, Dilsukhnagar, Behind HDFC Bank, Hyderabad.

¶14

... Res ponde nts/Complainant

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P -C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Crime No.62 of 2022 pending on the file of Police Station Gachibowli, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District

¶16

l.A. NO: 2OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner in Crime No.62 of 2022 pending on the file of Police Station Gachibowli, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the criminal petition.

¶18

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2022

¶19

Between:

¶20

Smt. Petluru'/asundara Devi , w/o.Late. P. Guruswami llerddy, Aged about 60 years, Occ. H rusewife, R/o. Palugodu, Dakkilimandalanr, l.lellcre Distnct.

¶21

Smt. P. Jalaj:, rv/o. Sri. P. Ashok Goud, Aged 60^years, O,;c.^-lousewife. Rl/o. 4-93, Chand; nagar, Serilingampally Mandal and Munic;ipalitlt, Ranga Reddy District.

¶22

3 Sri.P. Ashok Goud, S/o. Late. Sri. P.Rama Kistaiah. Aryed 70 years, Occ. Business, Rr r. 4-93, Chandanagar, Serilingampally l,4anr-lal and Municipality, Ranqa Redd) District.

¶23

...Petition:r, Ac:used No.1 to 3

¶24

AND

¶25

1 . The State of^-elangana , Represented by the Public Prcsc cutcr, High Court for the State^,rf Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶26

Smt. Shailaja Krishna, w/o. Sri. M.Radha Krishna, Aged 5,' years, Occ. Not known, R/o. tl.No. 16-11-7411D156, Dilsukhnagar, Behird HD=C Bank, Hyderabad.

¶27

...Resp<>n Cerrts/Complai nant

¶28

Petition und -'r Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that n ther circumstances stated in the l/emr^,r:indum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to vac rte the interim order passed in lA.No. 02.12022 in Crl.P.no. 193012022 dated.⁽ 3 03.2022 in the interest of justice.

¶29

This Petitior coming on for hearing, upon perusing tl-re lVlemorandum of Grounds of Crimin rl Petition and upon hearing the argumerrts :f Sri PRAMOD SINGH, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional lrublic. Prosecutor on behalf of the Res rondent No. and 1 of Sri N. AVANEEIiI-, Advocate for the Respondent No.2

¶30

The Court made tl e following: ORDER

¶31

¶32

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶33

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1930 OF 2022

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

This Criminal Petition is flled under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioners who are arrayed as Accused Nos.1 to 3 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in FIR No.62 of 2022 on the file of Station House Officer, Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy Dlstrict. The offences alleged against them are under Section 420, 447, 427, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶36

On instructions, learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that after completion of investigation in the subject crime, the^police filed charge sheet before the Court concerned. Hence, the^prayer sought for in the present petition has become infructuous.

¶37

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the^{petitioners-Accused} Nos.1 to 3 are at libefi to move this Court seeking^quashment of the^proceedings of the charge sheet.

¶38

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶39

Sd/. K. SHYLESHI DEPUTY R GISTRAR

/iTRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 . The Xlll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Kukatpally Prashanth Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶45

The Station House Officer, Police Station Gachibowli, Cyberabad District.

¶46

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.(OUT)

¶47

¶48

¶49

One CC to S il. PRAMOD SINGH, Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC to SF l. N. AVANEESH, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copi,;s. \ KA{ s^l

t t

HIGH COURT

\ \

DATED:05112 2022

51 ATE
(
a-: Cr
:
11 l[\ ?$2x
ir
i
t l -gatt i::.
::.-.:..,

¶55

ORDER

¶56

CRLP.No.193A of 2022

¶57

THE CRIMINAL PIiTITION IS DISMISSED AS TNFRU CTUOUS.

¶58

-\ r\L!
"&'r)

Smt. Petluru Vasundara Devi and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Petluru Vasundara Devi and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ayyalapu Vijayendar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Thadkamalla Saroja and another Vs The State of Telangana and another

Thadkamalla Harshavardhan Vs The State of Telangana and another

Gulam Khaja Moinuddin and another Vs The State Telangana and another

Yadma Sridhar Reddy, And 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana, And Another

Vajinepalli Radha Krishna and Another Vs Vasa Diya and Another