Dismissed

Dr. Faheem Rai and another v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC11 Nov 2022CRLP/1274/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment of proceedings. The court held the petition infructuous as a charge sheet had been laid, allowing the petitioners to file a fresh application if the cause survives.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to file fresh petition if cause survives.

Dr. Faheem Rai and another Vs The State of Telangana and… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:1274OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Dr. Faheem Rai, S/o. Khaja Mohammed Jalaal Rai, Aged about 57 years, Occ. Medical Practitioner

¶8

F ahad Rai, S/o. Dr. Faheem Rai, Aged about 33 years, Occ. Business,

¶9

Both R/o.H.No.8-2-3171N2, Near Banjara Hills Police Station, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

¶10

...Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶13

Mohd. Aleemuddin, S/o. Mohd. Moinuddin, Aged 47 years, Occ. Business, Rt/o. H. No. 9-4- 1 34 125 I 1 I N 1, Nadeem Colony, Tolichowki, Golconda, Hyderabad-500 008.

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceeding in Cr.No.11 of 2O22 of P.S. Gopalpuram L and O, Hyderabad in the interest of^justice.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Cr.No.1 1 of 2022 of P.S. Gopalpuram L & O, Hyderabad.

¶18

¶19

This Petition comin on for hearing, upon perusing the Merr oranclum of Grounds of Criminal Petition nd upon hearing the arguments of Sri. I\I,rhd Muzaffer Ullah Khan, Advocate for e^rretitioner and the Additional Publio^{i:'ros€ (rutor} on behalf of the Respondent^I .'l and None Appeared for the Respon,lent llo.2

¶20

The Court made th( l,:wing: ORDER

¶21

THE HON'BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITI N No.1274 OF 2022

¶23

ORDER:-

¶24

Seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners in Crime No. 11 of 2022 of Gopalpuram L&O Police Station, Hyderabad, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

¶25

No representation on petitioners' side on call

¶26

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that charge sheet is laid and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶27

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh petition in case the cause survlves.

¶28

¶29

Miscellaneous petitions, if an-v pending, shall stand closed.

¶30

¶31

SD/- T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 't..1,'l'

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To,

¶34

The X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.

¶35

The Station House Officer, Gopalapuram L and O^police Station, Secunderabad.

¶36

Two CCs to the Ardditional Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶37

One CC to Sri. Mohd Muzaffer Ullah Khan, Advocate [OPUC]

¶38

Two CD Copies

ho*

HIGH COUR'T

Dr. CSLJ

DATED:1111'112022

S
)6.\ <br>ry
I
id il r!l !l' I a
\d
'V"
<br>

¶44

ORDER

¶45

CRLP.No.'t27'4 of 2(r

¶46

DISMISSING THE CI MIIIAL PETITION AS INFRUCTU()Uf; l*Y , '.2^* G)

Dr. Faheem Rai and another v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Faheem Rai and another v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chada Ramesh Chander Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Chinthapandu Suresh Vs The State of Telangana

Myaka Praneeth Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Putta Rajendra Prasad Vs The State of Telanangana

Kothakota Vijay Kumar and 4 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Reguri Karunakar Vs The State of Telangana