Dismissed

Reguri Karunakar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Nov 2022CRLP/1058/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the charge sheet in the underlying criminal case had already been laid. Liberty was granted to file a fresh petition if the cause survives.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition if the cause survives.

Reguri Karunakar Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

¶3

oF TELANGANA rN rHE^H|GH "ouIf3$JJ=oB',#E

¶4

FRIDAY, THE^{ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEIVIBER} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTY TWO}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{DR. JUSTICECHILLAKUR SUMALATHA}

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION^{NO: 1058oF 2021}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Reguri Karunakar,^{S/o.Reguri Ramesham,Aged 43 years' Occ'Business'} R/o.H.No.1-84/1,^{KondannapallyVillage,GangadharaMandal' Karimnagar} District.

¶10

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED^{NO. 3}

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana,^{Through S.H.O, P.S, Nacharam, Rachakonda, Rep'} by its Public Prosecutor, High^{court at Hyderabad,Hyderabad}

¶13

..RESPONDENT

¶14

Smt. Nagamalla Uma Rani, W/o.Venkata^{Narsaiah, Aged} 51^years, Occ.Housewife, Rl/o.H.No.8-2-481, Kattarampur,^Karimnagar Town and District

¶15

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Criminal Proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused No.3 in Cr.No.339/2020 pending on the file of P.S, Nacharam, Rachakonda and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including Arrest of the Petitioner/Accused No.3 in Cr.No.339/2020 pending on the file of P.S, Nacharam, Rachakonda till the disposal of the lvlain Quash Petition in the interest of the^justice and pass such other order oi orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶19

This Petition ,;oming on for hearing, upon perusing lht,, Me_morandum of Grounds of Crimina Petition and upon hearing the argunrerrts of Sri C Hari Preeth, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public F'rciser:utor on behalf of the Respondent N r. 1 and of Sri K. Buchi Babu, Advocate fr:r the Respondent No.2

¶20

The Court made the bllowing: ORDER

¶21

THE HON'BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1O58 OF 2O2L

¶22

ORDER:-

¶23

Seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.339 of 2O2O of Nacharam Police Station, Rachakonda District, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

¶24

No representation on petitioner's side on call.

¶25

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that charge sheet is laid and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶26

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh petition in case the cause survives.

¶27

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, sha-ll stand

¶28

-l

¶29

Sd,-^{G. slREESHA} I closed. ASSI^{STANT REGISTRAR} & ,[RUE^COPYI' SECTION^OFFICER

¶30

To,

¶31

ffiff$;;;ru'ffirl:#

VHw

\ \

HIGH COUR-'

Dr. CSL, J

DATED: 1111112022

-: i fAi
a_.-
lf' .,",
/,
l1 ,iAN ?[?3

¶38

ORDER

¶39

CRLP.No.10!'8 o12021

¶40

Criminal Petition is dismissed

¶41

,\ &?(€L ffi"

Reguri Karunakar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reguri Karunakar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chada Ramesh Chander Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Chinthapandu Suresh Vs The State of Telangana

Myaka Praneeth Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Putta Rajendra Prasad Vs The State of Telanangana

Kothakota Vijay Kumar and 4 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Dr. Faheem Rai and another Vs The State of Telangana and another