Dismissed

Kothakota Vijay Kumar and 4 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC11 Nov 2022CRLP/1071/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this High Court of Telangana order, Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the charge sheet was laid in the underlying crime. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous due to laying of charge sheet; liberty granted to move fresh petition.

Kothakota Vijay Kumar and 4 others Vs The State of… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

I I I I i

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEN/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION No: 1071 of 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Kothakota Vijay Kumar, S/o. Lakshmanna, aged 32 years occ-Private Service,Rl/o. Flat No. 102, Acro Polis Tulip Jawaharnagar, It/oulali, Hyderabad.

¶9

Surender, S/o. Lakshmanna, aged 74 years Occ. Private Service, R/o. Plot No.'131, Jawaharnagar, Ir/oulali, Hyderabad.

¶10

Govinda Rao, S/o. Yadagiri, aged 47 years ,occ-Govt Employee,Rl/ o. West lr,4arredpally, Secunderabad

¶11

Smt.Sireesha, Wo. Kishore Kumar, aged 35 years, R/o. Flat No.102, Acro Polis Tulip Jawaharnagar, Ir/oulali, Hydera bad

¶12

N/ittamedhi Teja, S/o. Balraj, aged 24 yea rs, Occ-B usiness, Fl/o. lMahboobnagar, Mahaboobnagar District

¶13

...Petitioner/Accused 2 to 6

¶14

AND

¶15

The State of Telangana , Through Station House Officer, Nacharam Police Station, Rachakonda, Rang Reddy District Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, At Hyderabad.

¶16

.-.Respondent

¶17

SS Enterprises, Rep. by its Partner, Beesu Sai Kumar,R/o. H. No.2-6-88/6/1C, Occ: ltlledical Distributors, Ramnagar, Bhongir, Nalgonda District.

¶18

...RespondenU Defacto Complainant

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FlR.No.441l202O on the file of the Nacharam Police Station, Rachakonda.

¶20

¶21

A. N \J:^,,o F2 021

¶22

f^{,:,. kir,ifi'iffi} r{}tr*,ffi trT#r

¶23

This petition contrr ^ , **tf$qurff,r-i#ry;rffi ,ng not present. The court rnade the forowing: .RDER

¶24

IC, nant lnces t may Police

¶25

¶26

THE HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1O71 OF 2O2l

¶27

ORDER:.

¶28

I . Seekir-rg the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners in Crime No.441 o[ 2O2O of Nacharam Police Station, Rachakonda District, the prcsent Climinal PctiLion is liled.

¶29

No representation on petitioners' side on call.

¶30

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on^q,ritten in structions, submits that charge sheet is iaid and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become inlructuous.

¶31

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is clismissed granting liberty to the petitioners to move a fresl-r petition in case the cause survives.

¶32

Miscellar-reous petitions, if any pending, s1-ra1l staricl closed.

¶33

i L Sd/- K. SHYLESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶34

{-l

¶35

To,

¶36

l.ThelVAdditionalMetropolitanlvlagistrate-cum.lVAdditionalJuniorCivil Judge, Cyberabad^{at L.B.Nagar.}

¶37

The Station House^{officer,NacharamPolicestation,Nacharam, Hyderabad.}

¶38

Two CCs to the^{Public Prosecutor, High Court, at Hyderabad(OUT)}

¶39

Two CD Copies. 5 One CC to SRt. p NAGENDRA REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 6. One CC to SRt. J K RANJTT KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl

K;\'1

HIGH COURT

DT.CSL J

DATED:1 111112022

ORDER

CRLP.No.1071 of 2021

<L 1$ d sr4 r4,
t
^(
,l P7
h
ooJ [E[ 2[?2
'it
(Q=*r.^ro',. t't
-:z-;

¶47

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.

¶48

$\A--
))/
)ut\r "<br>

Kothakota Vijay Kumar and 4 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kothakota Vijay Kumar and 4 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chada Ramesh Chander Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Chinthapandu Suresh Vs The State of Telangana

Myaka Praneeth Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Putta Rajendra Prasad Vs The State of Telanangana

Reguri Karunakar Vs The State of Telangana

Dr. Faheem Rai and another Vs The State of Telangana and another