Disposed

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt.Narlagala Manimala

Telangana HC5 Sept 2022CMA/614/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal disposed of by way of settlement before the Lok Adalat. The insurance company withdrew its appeal, and the original award was confirmed. The matter was settled and closed without a substantive judgment from the High Court.

What did the court decide?

CMA disposed of in terms of Lok Adalat award; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; award confirmed; unpaid amount and interest to be paid within one month.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^32s8 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU CIVIL MISC ELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 614 OF 2009

¶4

Appeal under section 30 of w.c Act against order dated 2r -2-2oogin wc.no.67 of 2006 on the fire of the Commissioner Employeses, Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour Cricle at Hyderabad.

¶5

Between:

¶6

Bajaj Allianz General lnsurance Co Ltd, rep by iis Regional Manager O/o.6th Floor, Block-lll, White House, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶7

AND

¶8

...APPELLANT(S)

¶9

1 Smt.Narlagala Manimala, Wo.late Srl N.Krishna Goud Housewife Rl/o.Chennapur Village, Chivampet Mandal, Medak District. Now Rl/o.H.No.201311A, Dayanand Nagar,

¶10

2 Kum.N.Madhavi, D/o.late Sri N.Krishna Goud Student R/o.Chennapur Village, Chivampet Mandal, Medak District. Now Rl/o.H.No. 20_1311A, Dayanand Nagar,

¶11

3 Kum.N.Mamatha, D/o.late Sri N.Krishna Goud Student Ri/o.Chennapur Village, Chivampet Mandal, Medak District. Now Ri/o.H.No. 20_1311A, Dayanand Nagar,

¶12

4 Master N.Mahesh, S/o.late Sri N.Krishna Goud [R3 & 4 are minors rep by its natural mother & guardian R1l RIo.Chennapur Village, Chivampet Mandal, Medak District

¶13

5 Smt.N.Narsamma, Wo.Sri Anji Goud R:/o.Chennapur Vi age, Chivampet Mandal, Medak District. Now Rl/o.H.No.2O-l31lA, Dayanand Nagar,

¶14

Sri N Anji Goud, S/o.Venkat Goud R:/o.Chennapur Village, Chivampet Mandal, Medak District. Now Rl/o. H.No.20_131tA, Dayanand Nagar,

¶15

Sri Singa Reddy Anji Reddy, S/o.Sri S.Raji Reddy, Aged Major Ownerof Tractor Bearing No.Ap 23 H 5407 R/o.Chennapur Village, Shivampet Mandal, Medak District.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS/APPLICANTS/OPP .PARTY

¶17

Counsel for the Appeilant(s):SRt. RAMACHANDRAREDDy cADt

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: 1 TO 6: N.pARDHASARADHY

¶19

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

¶20

¶21

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU

¶22

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.614 OF 2OO9

¶23

JUDGMENT:

¶24

During the pendency of the appeal, the matter was referred to the Lok Adalat, and the sarne was settled before the Lok Adalat, vide Award dated 26.06.2022.

¶25

Accordingly, the CMA is disposed of, in terms of the

¶26

award passed by the Lok Adalat. No order as to costs.

¶27

Consequently, miscellaneous r petitions, if my,

¶28

pending, in this appeal sha,11 stand closed.

SD/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVI

I I

JOINT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Commissioner for^{Workmen's Compensation Asst Commissioner of} Labour Circle T.Anjaiah^{Karmika Samkshema Bhavan Rtc Cross Road at}

¶36

Hyderabad (with^record )

¶37

One CC to SRl. RAMACHANDRA^{REDDY GADI Advocate} [OPUCI

¶38

One CC to SRl. N.PARDHASARADHY^Advocate [OPUC]

¶39

Two CD Copies

¶40

One Spare Copy ,v'

¶41

(along with a copy of lok addalat award)

HIGH COURT

DATED:05/09/2022

ORDER

CMA.No.614 of 2009

r- s l-4 7'<:
v, <br>o) lr 1i
O 7 i1 ii J ?"frn

¶47

DISPOSING OF THE C.M.A

¶48

IN TERMS OF LPK ADAALATH AWARD

(L)

ma-

"\D'

a a/,

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶54

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

¶55

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD.

¶56

Iunder^seclion l, ol the legol Services Aulhorilio! Acl, I987 (Centrot Act)l

¶57

Date: 26-06-20 22

¶58

Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi

¶59

:,€a
,)
HllH CriURr a.
1 !-(t( /10ALa;
Ll
.':'"

¶60

Judge, Higfi Court for the State of Telangana 2. Sri N.Parameswara Reddy, Advocate, Member

¶61

Smt. T.Bala Jayasree, Advocate, Member

¶62

CMA No. 61 4 of 7009

¶63

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶64

AGAIN5T

¶65

c,No. 67 of 2006

¶66

(On the fite of the Commissioner for Workmen,s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-l: T.Anjaiah Karmika Samkshema Bhavan: RTC Cross Roads: at Hyderabad)

¶67

Between:

¶68

Bajaj Attianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Regionat Manager, 6th ftoor, Btock lll, White House, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶69

Appettant/Opp. Party no.2.

¶70

AND

¶71

Smt. Nartaga(a Manimata W/o Late Sri- N. Krishna

¶72

Goud, aged 36 yrs, Occ: House Wife-

¶73

Kumari N. tvtadhavt D/o Sri- Late N. Krishna Goud, Aged 18 yrs, Student.

¶74

Kumari N. Mamatha D/o Sri. Late N. Krishna coud, Aged 17 yrs, Student.

¶75

Master N. Mahesh S/o Sri. Late N. Krishna Goud, Aged 1l yrs.

¶76

Respondents 3 and 4 were being minors nep.{ its natura[ mother & guardian Respondent No.1

¶77

Smt. N. Narsamma W/o Sri. Anji Goud, Aged 60 yrs.

¶78

Sri N. Anji coud S/o Venkat Goud, aged 65 yrs. Att are native of Chennapur vittage, Shivampet Mandat, Medak Dist., Presentty residing at H.No. Z0-131lA, Dayanand Nagar, Matkaigiri, Hyderabad.

.Ti"ft

tt. y.---t* D4

Sri. Singa Reddy Anji Reddy Sio sri. 5. Raji Reddyaged major, Occ. Owner of Tractor bearing no. APZ3 H 5407 , R/o Chennapur vittage, shivampetl'tandat' l'ledakDist'

¶83

....Respoodents/Appticants/opp.^party.

¶84

AWARD

¶85

This is an appeat fited by the appeltant/lnsurance Company.

¶86

The Learned Counsel for the Appettant/ lnsurance Company represented that the lnsurance Company is withdrawing the appeat fited by it.

¶87

The said representation is recorded and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-1, Hyderabad. The amount if any remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be paid by the lnsurance Company within one month from the date of receipt of the award, atong with interest.

¶88

The Respondents/Petitioners are permitted to withdraw their respective shares as per the apportionment and orders made by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and ? Assistant Commissioner of Labour-1, Hyderabad.

¶89

This Award shatt be subject to verification of cross appeat/cross objection, if aoy, filed by the Respondents, otherwise the parties are at liberty to appty for recat( of this Order/Award.

¶90

Court fee paid on this appeat shatl be refunded.

¶91

No costs.

¶92

For EaiajAllianz General lnsurance Co. Ltd
A,nddd,6r-
Appettant/Opp. Party No.2
lnsurance Com
N lb*"-1* ^ kUt 4'. ru^lt (Z,Lt^t-
CHAIR/r{AN I EAiBER ,,{EMBERI u
a vrC[.!.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt.Narlagala Manimala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt.Narlagala Manimala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Varsha Bhayyaji Pipare Vs The Union of India

Farhat Khatoon Vs Md. Amjad Khan

E.Rajavva and 2 Others Vs K.P.Gangaram

R. Narender Vs a. Srinivas

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, Hyd Vs Smt. a. Ramulamma and 3 Others

Gyni Srinivas Vs The Union of India