The appeal in an original suit was dismissed by the High Court due to non-prosecution. No representation was present when the matter was listed for dismissal.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; other pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAI)
[32581
FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU
APPEAL SUIT NO: 800 OF 2002
Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree dated 21 -01.2002 made in O.S.No. 24 of 1997 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Uagityal.
Between:
...APPELLANTS/DEFEN DANTS
AND
K.P.Gangaram, S/o Rajaiah Agril. Rl/o Katlakunta (V), Medipalli (M), Karimnagar Dislrict.
...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. A.SUDERSHAN REDDY (NOT APPEARED) Counsbl for the Respondent: SRl. V.RAVINDER RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE I{ON'BLE SRI .'USTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU
APPEAL SUIT No.SOO OF 2OO2
ORDER:
Challenge in this appeal is the order rendered by Senior Civil Judge, Jagityal in O.S.No.24 of 1997, dated 21.O1.2002.
\
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.K.SRINIVASA BAO JOINT REGISTRAR t I
SECTION OFFICER
To
1 The Senior Civil Judge, Jagityal(with record) 2 One CC to SRl. A SUDERSHAN REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 3 One CC to SRl. V.RAVINDER RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies
PSK.
9
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210912022
ORDER
AS.No.800 of 2002
-i tli STA
q
of,
L) 01 Ft$ ?{m e
,i
*
t
DEEPATc',r
DISMISSING AS FORNON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.
@ry?t W*
E. Rajawa and others
K.P. Gangaram
Sambasivarao Naidu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
