Disposed

Ainala Nandini v. Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao and another

Telangana HC11 Apr 2022CC/211/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single common order disposed of multiple contempt cases filed against ONGC/TSGENCO officials for alleged non-compliance of a High Court order dated 03-10-2018. The court granted 12 weeks to implement the original order and closed the contempt proceedings without costs.

What did the court decide?

Twelve weeks time granted to implement the order dated 03-10-2018; contempt cases disposed of without costs.

Ainala Nandini Vs Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao and another — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE IIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA And

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶6

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 203. 204 . 205. 207, 208 . 211. 213. 233 &^{23sOF 2020}

¶7

C.C. No. 203 ot 2020

¶8

(Contempt Chse Under Section l0 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent herein for, rvillfully violating, the Order of the High Court dated 03-10-2018 in W.P. No. 25656 ot 2017 )

¶9

Between:

¶10

B. Shankar S/o. Harisingh, Aged 28 years, Rl/o. H.No.9-63, Jagannadhapuram Village, Paloncha Mandal, B. Kothgudem District.

¶11

N. Krishna, S/o. Sreeramu, Aged 36^years, Rl/o. Penagadapa Village, B. Kothaguem District.

¶12

Guguloth Veeranna, S/o. G. Mangya, Aged 23^years, R/o. D.No.1-12211, Seethampeta Village, Reddipalem Mandal, B. Kothaguem District.

¶13

...PET|T|ONERy 2,4 & 5 in WP No. 25656 of 2017

¶14

AND

¶15

Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao , lManaging Director, APGENCO, (presently TSGENCO), Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad

¶16

Sri. Samayya, Chief Engineer (O & M) Kothagudem Thermal Power Station, KTPS-V Stage, Paloncha, B.Kothagudem District

¶17

... Respondents 2 & 4 in W.P. 25656 of 2017

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. V. SHIVAJI

¶19

Gounsel forthe Respondents: SMT. K. UDAYA SRI

¶20

(-/-'-

¶21

¶22

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 204 OF 2020

¶23

(Contempt Case Under Section l0 to l2 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent helein for, lvillfully violating, the Order of the High Court dated 03-10-2018 in W.P. No. 39555 ot 2017 |

¶24

Between:

¶25

Syed Mujahid Pasha, S/o. Hussain, Aged 50 years, R/o. H.No.17-1-206/1 , Bollorigudem, New Paloncha, B.Kothagudem District - 507115.

¶26

..,PETITIONER

¶27

AND

¶28

'1 . Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao, Managing Director, APGENCO, (presently TSGENCO), Vidyut Soudha Hyderabad

¶29

Sri. Samayya, Chief Engineer (O and M) Kothagudem Thermal Power Station, KTPS-V Stage, Paloncha, B.Kothagudem District.

¶30

... Respondents

¶31

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. V. SHIVAJI

¶32

Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. K. UDAYA SRI

¶33

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 205 OF 2020

¶34

(Contempt Case Under Section l0 to l2 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent herein for, willfully violating, the Order of the High Court dated 03-10-2018 in W.P. No.36512 ol 2017 )

¶35

Between:

¶36

Valadasu Praveen Kumar, S/o. Ramulu, Aged 34 years, R/o. H.No. 112-216, Gandhinagar, New Paloncha, B.Kothagudem District.

¶37

...PETITIONER

¶38

AND

¶39

'1 . Sri. D. Prabhakar Ra-o , Managing Director, ApGENCO, (presently TSGENCO), Vidyut Soudha Hyderabad

¶40

91._S-a.Tqyya, Chief Engineer (O & N/) Kothagudem Thermal power Station, KTPS-V Stage, Paloncha, B.Kothagudem District.

¶41

... RESPONDENTS

¶42

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. c. V. SHIVAJI

r-1

.--)

Counsel for the Respondents:^{SMT. K. UDAYASRI}

¶47

CONTEMPT CASE NO:^{2O7 OF 2020}

¶48

(Contempt Case Under Section l0^{to L2 of Contempt of CourtsAct to} punish the Respondent lrerein^{for, willfullyviolating, the order of the High} Courtdated O3-10-2018^{in W.P.No.27594 ot 2017 </sup>}

¶49

Between:

¶50

M. Sreenivas Rao , S/o.^{1r,4. Krishnaiah, aged 40 years,Fl/o. H.No. 1-3-86, Old} Paloncha, Bhadradri^- Kothagudem^District.

¶51

P. Ramesh, S/o. P.^{Narsayya,Aged 38 years,R/o .H.No 3-3-29,Haniman} Basthi, Kothagudem, Bhadradri^{- Kothagudem District}

¶52

M. Ramesh, S/o.^{M.Krishnaiah,aged 40 years,Rl/o. H.No 1-3-86' Old} Paloncha, Bhadradri^- Kothagudem^District.

¶53

..PETITIONERS/ 1, 2 & 3 in^{W.P. No' 27594 of 20'17}

¶54

AND

¶55

Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao , Managing^{Director, APGENCO' (presently} TSGENCO). Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad.

¶56

Sri. Samayya, Chief Engineer^{(O & M) Kothagudem Thermal Power Station,} KTPS-V Siige, Paloncha, B.Kothagudem^District.

¶57

RESPONDENTS / 2 & 4 in^{W.P. No. 27594 ot 2017}

¶58

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G.^{V. SHIVAJI}

¶59

Counsel for the Respondents:^{SMT. K. UDAYASRI}

¶60

CONTEM PT CASE NO: 208 OF 2020

¶61

(Contempt Case Under Section I0 to l2 of Contempt of Courts Act^{to punish} the Respondent herein for, willfully^{violating, the Order of the High Court} dated 03-'10-2018 in W.P. No.^{14270 of 2018} )

¶62

Between:

¶63

Korlapati Shiva Ram, S/o. Koteswar Rao, aged^{21 years,R/o} C/o. H.No. 6-2-93, Seetha Ram Patnam, Paloncha, B.Kothagudem District ...PETITIONER AND

¶64

Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao, Managing Director, APGENCO,^(presently TSGENCO), Vidyut Soudha Hyderabad

¶65

Sri. Samayya, Chief Engineer^(O and M) Kothagudem Thermal^{PowerStation,} KTPS-V Stage, Paloncha, B.Kothagudem District.

...RESPONDENTS

('t4

I//

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G. V. SHIVAJI

¶71

Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. K. UDAYA SRI

¶72

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2'11 OF 2020

¶73

. (Contempt Cflse Under Section l0 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent herein for, willfully violating, the Order of the High Court dated 03-10-2018 in W.P. No. 43900 of 2017 |

¶74

Between:

¶75

Ainala Nandini, D/o. Veeraiah, Aged 27 years, Fyo. H.No. 9-2-20, Teachers Colony, New Paloncha, B. Kothagudem District. ...PETITIONER AND

¶76

1 Srl._D- Prabhakar Rao , Managing DirectorAPGENCO, (presently TSGENCO), Vidyut Soudha Hyderabad

¶77

2 Sri. Samayya, Chief Engineer (O & M) Kothagudem Thermal Power Station, KTPS:V Stage, Paloncha, B.Kothagudem Dis[rict

¶78

...RESPONDENTS

¶79

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. V. SHIVAJI

¶80

Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. K. UDAYA SRI

¶81

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 213 OF 2020

¶82

(Contempt Cnse Under Section l0 to l2 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent herein for, rvillfulh' violating, the Order of the lligh Court dated 03-10-2018 in W.P. No. 26248 of ZO,l7 )

¶83

Between:

¶84

B. Charan S/o. Devjee, Aged 25 years, Ryo. Sarpanch Thanda, Sarvaram Village, Sujathanagar Mandal, B. Kothagudeni District.

¶85

P. 9ryra Shankar, S/o. Venkateswarlu, Aged 34 years, R/o. H.No. 9-2_ 76, l\4athura Basthi, B. Kothgudem Distric[.

¶86

D.. Veeranna, S/o. Panthuliya.,_ Aged 36 years, H.No. 4-72, Sarpanch Thanda, Sarvaram Village, B. Kothagudeni District.

¶87

M.. .B_havsingh,. S/o. Mansingh, Aged 30 years, Rl/o. H.No. 2-2, Pitchikalapadu Village, B. Koth-agudem District.' ...pEIT|oNERS

¶88

AND

¶89

1 Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao Managing Director, APGENCO, (presenily fSGENCO), Vidyut Soudha Hydeladad

¶90

¶91

,-9

¶92

Sri. Samayya, Chief^{Engineer(O-& M) Kothagudem.Thermal Power} Station, KfpS-V Stage,^{Paloncha, B.Kothagudem District}

¶93

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶94

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRl.G. V. SHIVAJI}

¶95

Counsel forthe Respondents:^{SMT. K. UDAYA SRI}

¶96

CONTEMPT CA^{SE NO: 233 OF 2020}

¶97

(contempt Case Under Sectiou 10 to^{12 of contemptof courts Act to punish} the Respondent herein for,^{willfully violating, the orderof the High court} dated 03-10-2018 in W.P. No.^{3'1953 of 2017} |

¶98

Between:

¶99

Namburi Appa Rao, S/o.^{N.Narayana, aged 54 years, Fl/o' H.No.4-2-15111481N311'} ..'PETITIONER Siinivas Nagar, B. Kothgudem District. AND

¶100

Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao,^{Managing Director APGENCO, (presently TSGENCO)'} Vidyut Soudha, HYderabad

¶101

2.sri.samayya,ChiefEngineer(OandM)KothagudemThermalPowerStation, KTPS-V Siige, Paloncha,^{B.Kothagudem District}

¶102

...RESPONDENTS

¶103

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRl.G. V. SHIVAJI}

¶104

Counsel for the Respondents:^{SMT. K. UDAYASRI}

¶105

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 235 OF²⁰²⁰

¶106

(Contempt Case Under Section 10 to l2 of Contempt^{of Courts Act to punish} the Respondent herein for, rvillfully^{violating, the Order of the High Court} dated 03-10-2018 in W.P. No. 35079^{of 20'17} |

¶107

Between:

¶108

1 Dasari Shyam Shashi Gowd, S/o.^{DasariBondaiah, aged 29 ygars,Fyo. C/o.} H.No. B-2-1 28, Bandarigudem, Surdaraiah^{Nagar, Manuguru, B.Kothagudem} District

¶109

2 Bhukya Naveen, S/o. Bhukya lvlansingh, aged^{25 years, Rio. C/o. H.No.B-2-} 128, Bandarigudem, Surdaraiah Nagar, Manuguru,^{B.KothagudemDistrict.}

-..PETITIONERS

AND

<--⁶

Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao, Managing Director, APGENCO, (presently TSGENCO), Vidyut Soudha Hyderabad

¶114

Sri. Samayya, Chief Engineer (O and M) Kothagudem Thermal Power Station, KTPS-V Stage, Paloncha, B.Kothagudem District

¶115

... RESPONDENTS

¶116

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G. V. SHIVAJI

¶117

Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. K. UDAYA SRI

¶118

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

¶119

THE HON'B LE THE CHIEF JUSTI CE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND

¶120

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND I<II

¶121

os. 2rL 3

¶122

COMMON ORDER pe, ot Hq:u. 6. c*4rlie sad,h ch,ka6 e@)

¶123

The present contempt cases have been filed alleging non_ compliance of the order dated 03. 10.20 i g passed by the Division Bench in the respective writ petitions.

¶124

The Division Bench, while passing the order dated 03.10.2018, has granted twelve (12) weeks time to implement the order and subsequently, interim order was passed in the review/ suspension petitions filed in the matter. In the light of the interim order, the order of the Division Bench dated 03.10.2018 has not been implemented.

¶125

Therefore, twelve ( 12) weeks time from today is granted to implement the order dated 03.1O.2Olg passed by the Division Bench.

¶126

With the aforesaid, the contempt cases stand disposed of.

¶127

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

¶128

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶129

//TRUE COPY// SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRARail\ REGISTRAR^I

¶130

To,

¶131

Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao , Managing^{Director, APGENCO' (presently}

¶132

TSGENCO), Vidyut Soudha Hyderabad

¶133

Sri. Samayya, Chief Engineer^(O and^{M) Kothagudem Thermal Power Station'} KTPS-V Stage, Paloncha, B.Kothagudem^District.

¶134

{b^f

¶135

b*..iEr.r

¶136

a
One GC to SRl. G. V. SHIVAJI, Advocate tOP-UCl-
<br>4 o;; ac to sN/T. K. UDAYA sRl, Advocate IoPUCI
5 Two CD CoPies
6
KUL
SB
One Spare V CoPY

HIGH COURT

DATED:1110412022

I
1 .dE S IA IA.
?
o 2 3 JUN 2022 'i
\ .:.'. + ..* / //
'a-' /

¶141

COMMON ORDER

¶142

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 203. 204 .20s.207.2 08

¶143

211, 213, 233, 23s AF 2020 0F 2020

¶144

DISPOSING OF THE ALL CONTEMPT CASES

¶145

WITHOUT COSTS

¶146

Lot:-.-

Ainala Nandini v. Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ainala Nandini v. Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Somaiah, Hyd Vs the Addl. Labour Court, Hyd and Ano

Bhukya Janardhan Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Great India Mining Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana and another

B. Shankar and 2 others Vs Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao and another

Valadasu Praveen Kumar, Vs Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao and another

Dasari Shyam Shashi Gowd Vs Sri. D. Prabhakar Rao