The High Court of Telangana dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn despite the petitioner's request for specific directives regarding illegal constructions and non-compliance with Panchayat Raj Act provisions.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 4645 OF 2021
Between:
Bhukva Janardhan. s/o. Bhukya LaxmanAged about 41 years,occ.Agriculture ruo.'i.f''to. '1-1-2i, CnunchuballiThanda, ChunchupalliVillage and 1vlandal Bhadradri -Kothagudem District-SO7 101
...pE,,oNER
AND
2 The commissioner,Pr;;'h;;;i ill inJnuiaroeuLlopmento9ga1m911!anchavat - nrie;ioing. uro, trnu','iiiniuyuti r'lug" Hvderahad State of relangana 3. The Districteancr,ayat'drii;;iH;;;;;rr.. viivjnjgrrcolonv Gram Panchavat " Cffi ffi;rii rtlanoir, enadradri-Kothasud"',o'tXltSnunchuparli tr,4andal, a ir-r"'s".iEiury,Vidyanagarcolony Gram Panchav
PetltionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe cl rcumstan ces statedi n t*'*o "'n f i ledth ::e^:r:ht " tI: T:[:1::::"J':f:i <sup>: ''esponOents ;l.,,orderor direction moreparticulan' """ ',,"::;;;;;;--,r.the provisionsor ;; 1 to8 in not complying with declarethe action of tnu section52(E),ll4andl20andotherprovisionsoftheTelanganaPanohayatRajAct 2018and. rule 33 o' tn"-'*nnanaGram PanchyatLandDevelopment (layout and bur\drns$Ru\es 2002 and no\ consider\ns t": "iiJ:I:-:J'::ilji:1"::::ff: besides\he app\catrons oi Ba\agam SreedharSlo'
.-'--
Bhargav dated. 30-05-202o,26-05-2020and 25-11-2019and ground realityand public against the illegal constructionsof respondent No.9 in land bearing sy.No. 4Bl1/A,to an extent of 1200 squareyardssituatedat vidyanagar colony GramPanchayat, Chunchupalli tvlandal, Bhad radri-Kothagudem District andnot taking any action thereon and consequently direct the respondents 1 to B to comply with the provisions of section 52 (E), 114 and 12O and other provisions of the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act 2018 and rule 33 of the Telangana Gram Panchyat Land Development (layout and buildings) Rules 2002, and consider the representations of the petitioner besides applications of Balagam Sreedhar s/o. sriramulu and paddam srilatha wo. Bhargav dated. 30-0s2020,26-05-2020 and 2s-11-2019 against the illegal constructions of respondent No. 9 in land bearing Sy.No.48/1/Ato an extent of 1200 square yards situated at Vidyanagar colony Gram Panchayat, chunchupaili Mandar, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District and stop further construction at the site and demorish the iregar construction thereon
IA NO: 10 F 2021
Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents No 'l to B to stop the illegar construction of respondent No.9 in rand bearing Sy.No. 4Bl1/A, to i G ra mpa n c h a y",, c h,,. h ;;";ffi :: :: I ffi :[T^fl:il]:il"ff : I]ilff::":;,'.,
IAN o:2OF 2021
Petition un affidavit fited in der Section 1S1 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1to B to demolish the illegal co nstructions of respondent No. 9 in land Gram panchayat, bearing Sy.No 4Bt1tA to an extent of 1200 square yards situated at Vidyana gar colony Chunchupalli Mandal rmmediately made without permiss Bhadradri-Kothagudem District being ton and arbitrarily
tA NO: 3 OF 2021:
Between:
AND#$t:,np;ruNtnli-lif#,*flE,*ffi;
"PET,TIoNER/gr, REspoNDENt
Petitionunder Section 151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in suppor.tof the petition, the High courtmay be pleasedto vacate the interimorderdated05/02/202llivingitopentothecompetentauthoritytotakeactionin accordancewithlawwitnaueandsufficientopportunitytotheansweringrespondent. Counselfor the'Petitioner:SRI P' SAI SANTOSH counserror Respondent Nos' r to a' G{ffit#t?lA;f,lfii' -
counserror Respondent No' 4: 3tr%XtF^\iF[r.fii'l^t
Counselfor Respondent Nos'5 to 7: GP FOR REVENUE Counselfor Respondent No' 8: GPFOR SOCIALWELFARE
Counselfor Respondent No' 9: NONE APPEARED
TheCourtmade the foltowing:ORDER
/i
C
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SIIARMA AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.464S of 2O21
ORDER: Per tlrc lton'ble the Chief JLlstice Sattsh Chandra SlLatma)
Learned counsel lor the petitioner prays tor withdrarval of the present ,tvrit petition, as it has become inlructuous
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The miscellaaeous applications pending, if any, shali stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
To,
//TRUE COPYII AssrsriE}..%fll#^.A -z SECTION OFFICER
1 2 .) J 4 5. 6. 7.. MBC ffffgff**#d"r'ffi*,,,:aji#ffi a{
f
I I
HIGHCOURT
HCJ & AKS,J
DATED:Ogto4l2022
1 pe a;,TA rt-
(t
Ct
2 $ r,ii: zo22
o
^r
<br>,;,)
* DSSPAT
r.i
ORDER
WP.No.4645'of 2021
I
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
nP
,a
Bhukva Janardhan
State of Telangana
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
