Dismissed

Damgatla Lakshmanna , Golla Lakshmamma v. P.Uday kumar

Telangana HC10 Mar 2022CC/130/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This contempt case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act was filed for alleged willful disobedience of an order of 27.09.2021. The court held that the underlying order was complied with as the applicant's online application had been considered, and consequently dismissed the contempt petition by closing the case.

What did the court decide?

The contempt case and pending miscellaneous applications were closed as the alleged disobedience was not sustained.

Damgatla Lakshmanna , Golla Lakshmamma Vs P.Uday kumar — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF^MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{A.ABHISHEKREDDY}

¶5

CONTEM PT CASE NO: 130 OF 2022

¶6

Contempt Case under Sections 10 to¹² of^{Contemptof Courts Act to} Punish the Respondents herein for willfully^{and wantonly violatingthe orderof} the High Court dated 27.O9.2021 in^{W.P.No.23340o'f 2021.}

¶7

Betwee n:

¶8

Damgatla Lakshmanna @ Golla Lakshmamma, S/o^{Subanna, aged about 54} years-, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Koppunoor Village, Chinnambhavi^lVlandal, Wanaparthi District.

¶9

Damgatla Nagesh, S/o Subanna, aged about^{65 years, Occ. Agriculture,Fl/o} Koppunoor Village, Chinnambhavi [/andal, Wanaparthi^District.

¶10

Damgatla Nageshwara Rao @ Golla Nageshwara^{Rao, S/o Subanna,aged} aboui 69^ye5rs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Koppunoor^{Village, Chinnambhavi} Mandal, Wanaparthi District.

¶11

...PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

P.Uday kumar, s/o not known , age. 35^yrs ocp. district collector^of Nagarkurnool district R/o District collector office Nagarkurnool^(Erstwhile Mahabubnagar District).

¶14

Hanuma naik, s/o not known , age. 50yrs, ocp. Revenue^{divisionofficer} Kollapour R/O kollapour rdo office^{kollipour,Nagarkurnool District (Erstwhile} Mahabubnagar District).

¶15

V.Ramesh, s/o not^known ,^{age. 40yrs, ocp. The.Tahsildar Pentlavelly} - UrnOii fligarkurnool Districl, R/o irlagarkurnool district (Erstwhile Mahabubnagar District).

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Counsel for the^{Petitioners: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR}

¶18

Counsel for the^{Respondent Nos.'l & 2: GP FOR REVENUE}

¶19

Counsel for the^{RespondentNo.3: SRI BOYA RAVINDER REDDY}

¶20

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶21

¶22

THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

CONTEM PT CASE No .L30 of 2022

¶25

The present contempt Case is filed arleging willful disobedience of the order dated 27 09 '2021, passed by this Court in w.p.No.2334 0 of 202r,by the responrrents.

¶26

The operative portion of the order dated,2z.09.2021 rearis as unrrer:

¶27

"The ruit petition is dispoxd of directing tle resporrdent outhoritics to consider the online application of the petitioner, dntetl 19.05.2021, tnd pnss necessary orders tlrereon, stictly in accordnnce ruith lau, ns etpeditiously os possible, preferably, toithin n period of eight rueeks from tlu date of receipt of n copy of tltis ortler, duly putting a the interestetl pnrties on notice and consitreritrg trrc objections, if any."

¶28

The learned Government pleader for Revenue has stated that onrine application of the petitioner dated 1g.0s.2021, has already been considered and necessary orders were passed thereon, and to that effect, he has produced the endorsement of the Tahsildar, pentavally, dated 11.01.2022.

¶29

In view of the above, the Contempt Case is closed.

¶30

The Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.

¶31

There shall be no order as to costs

¶32

SD/.A.V.S.S.C.S.M.SARMA

¶33

DEPU REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

P Uday kumar, occ. District Collector of Nagarkurnool District R/o Djstrict Collector Office, Nagarkurnool (Erstwhile Mahabubnagar District).

¶38

Hanuma Naik, occ. Revenue Division Officer, Kollapour Rl/O Kollapour RDO

¶39

Office, kollapour, Nagarkurnool District (Erstwhile Mahabubnagar District).

¶40

.) V.Ramesh, occ. The Tahsildar Pentlavelly Mandal, Nagarkurnool District; Fyo Nagark_urnool District (Erstwhile Mahabubnagar District).

¶41

4A Qne Qne^{CC CCto to Sri Boya Ravinder Reddy, Sri Rapolu Bhaskar,Advocate Advocate} [OPUC][OPUC] 6 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶42

&'I Two CD CopiesOne Spare Copy

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1010312022

ORDER

C.C.No.130 of 2022

-i i'lu o '^r.
o 1 9 APB 2OI2
p_a-i c.P /

¶48

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE

¶49

Damgatla Lakshmanna , Golla Lakshmamma v. P.Uday kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Damgatla Lakshmanna , Golla Lakshmamma v. P.Uday kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Varanasi Prashanth Vs The State of Telangana

Mudiraj Sangam (Muttarasi) Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Akruthi Builders and Developers Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others

Kinnera Shyam, Vs The State of Telangana

Madiraju Ram Koteswar Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Massimukku Anjaneyulu Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others