Disposed

Mudiraj Sangam (Muttarasi) v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Mar 2022WP/9935/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging failure to grant membership to Petitioner's Sangam in Respondent 10's cooperative society despite representations. Court disposed of the petition at the admission stage directing the District Fisheries Officer to consider the representation within eight weeks without examining merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No. 4 (District Fisheries Officer) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.01.2022 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

Mudiraj Sangam (Muttarasi) Vs The State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF [/ARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 9935 OF 2022

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

ll4udiraj Sangam (lvluttarasi), Rep by its Youth President, S. Swamy S/o Kistaiah, Aged about 41 years, R/o Chinna Nizampet Village, Dubbaka l,4andal, Siddipet District, Telangana Slate

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry Dairy Development and Fisheries Department, Secretariat BRK Bhavan, Hyderabad

¶11

The Commissioner of Fisheries, Shanthi Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana State

¶12

The District Collector, Siddipet District, Telangana State

¶13

The District Fisheries Officer/ Assistant Director of Fisheries, Siddipet District, Telangana State

¶14

The Additional Collector, Local Bodies Siddipet District, Telangana State

¶15

The Assistant Executive Engineer lrrigation Department, Sub Division No.4, Siddipet District, Telangana State

¶16

The Tahsildar, Dubbaka lt/andal, Siddipet District Telangana State

¶17

The Station House Officer, Bhoompally Police Station Siddipet Comm issionerate, Telangana State

¶18

The Chinna Nizampet Grampanchayat, Rep by its Panchayat Secretary, Chinna Nizampet Village, Dubbaka I/andal, Siddipet District Telangana State

¶19

10.The Primary Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited, Rep by its President, Pothareddypet Village, Dubbaka lVandal, Siddipet District, Telangana State

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more partrcularly one in the nature of a WRIT OF TVANDATVUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the representation of the Petitioner daled 2810112022 and not providing

¶22

membership to the Petitioner's sangam, in 1Oth Respondent's society i.e., primary Fishermen cooperative s991etv Limited, Rep by its president, notnareacrfpet Village, Dubbaka l,4andar, siddipet Drstrict, Terangana state, as per con,rs.r',roloa dared 2210i11964 and GoMs.No.74 dated 211i012011 and GbN,rs.No.6 dateo 241o312016, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of naturat justice and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 2810112022 by providing membership to the petitioner,s Sangam, in^'lOth Respondent's Society i.e., primary Fishermen coopuratiue !99iutv^{Limited,Rep by its president, pothareddypet viilage, Dubbakai^r/andar,} :iqg'_p9t^{District, Telanganastate, as per Gorvs.No.98dated 22-01-1964} and GoMs.No.74 dated 21t10/201 1 and GotMs.No.6 dated 24t0312016, in the interest of^justice.

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 20

¶24

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the representation of the petitioner dated 2_810112022 by providing membership to the petitioner's lr,4udiral sangam in 10th Respondent's society i.e., Primary Fishermen cooperative soiiety Limited, Rep by its President, Pothareddypet Vilrage, Dubbaka l,4andar, srooipet District, Telangana State, as per GOI,4s.No.98 dated 22lojl1964 and GOtr,/s No .74 dated 2111012011 and Golvs.No.6 dated 2410312016, pending disposal of the main writ Petition.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.L.pANDU

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,2,4: Gp FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3,5,7: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶28

Counsel for the Respondent No.6: Gp FOR IRRIGATION & CAD

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent No.8: Gp FOR HOME

¶30

Counsel for the Respondent No.9: SRI M.RAM GOpAL RAO, SC for Gram Panchayat

¶31

Counsel for the Respondent No.10: None Appeared

¶32

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶33

'l'llt- IION'llLE SItI JUSTICE r' AIltllsltEK REDDY WRI'I'PETITI ON^{No.9935 of 2022}

¶34

ORDER

¶35

Heard the leamed^{counsel for the petitioner and the} learned Govelrment^{Pleaders for AnirnalHusbandry'} Revenue, Irrigation^{and Homeappearing on behalf of} Respondent^{Nos.1, 2 & 4; 3, 5 & 7: 6 and 8 respectively and} Sri M.Ramgopal^{Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing on} behall ol^{RespondentNo.9' With their consent, the present} Wlit Petition^{is being disposedof at the adrnissionstage'}

¶36

QLrestioning^{the action of the respondents in not} considerirrg the^{petitioner's represeutation dated 28'01 '2022} and not^{providingmembershipto the petitioner'sSangam'as} per G.O.Ms.Nos.98,^{74 and 6, dated 22'01'1964,21'10'2011} and 24.03.2016^{respectively,the petitioner has filed the} present Writ Petition'

¶37

Having regard^{to the fact that the petitionerhad already} rnade a representation^{dated 28.01 .2022 to respondent No'4 -}

¶38

¶39

AAR, J W P.No.q93s or 20r2

¶40

District Fisheries Officer/Assistant Dircctor of Fisherics. Siddipet District, ventilating their grievance, rvithout going into the merits or dernerits ol the case. this Writ Petition is disposcd of with the dircction to rcspondcnt No.4 to consiclcr' tl.re representation ol thc petitioner dated 28.01.2022 ancl pass appropriate orders in accordancc rvitli Iar.v. as ex;reclitiousJl, as possible, prel'erably, within a period of eight (8) weeks il'oni the date of receipt of a copy of this orcler.

¶41

4, Miscellaneous applications, if any ltencling, shall stand

¶42

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶43

SD/.T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY' (t'i ) SECTION OFFICER

¶44

To, 1. The District Fisheries officer/ Assistant Director of Fisheries, siddipet District, Telangana State

¶45

fwo CCs to the GP for Animal Husbandry, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT]

¶46

Two CCs to the GP for^{Revenue,HighCourt for the State of Telangana} [OUT] 4. Two CCs to the GP^{for lrrigation & CAD, HighCourt for the Stateof}

¶47

Telangana [OUT]

¶48

Two CCs to the GP for Home,^{High Court for the State of Telangana} [OUT]

¶49

One CC to SRI D.L.PANDU,^Advocate [OPUC]

¶50

One CC to SRI M.RATUGOPAL^{RAO, SC for Gram Panchayat} [OPUC]

¶51

Two C.D. Copies.

¶52

One Spare Copy. IVlRC

\4NIA

HIGH COURT

DATED:09/03/2022

ORDER

WP.No.9935 of 2022

:i ,iE 5 r.4
c!{
'|t
o 11 AP!] 2i[?
1
{t
olsr
*..1

¶59

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶60

J-

Mudiraj Sangam (Muttarasi) v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mudiraj Sangam (Muttarasi) v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malreddy Ramreddy Vs The Telangana State Information Commission

Pusuluri Srinivasa Rao and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and 11 others

M/s Sri Srinivasa Transport Contractors Vs The State of Telangana

Varanasi Prashanth Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Akruthi Builders and Developers Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others

G. Uma Devi Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others