The petitioner filed a contempt case alleging non-compliance of court orders dated 26.12.2019 regarding a representation. The court found no negligence by respondents and held the petitioner was not concerned with the layout, thus closing the case.
The Contempt Case is closed and pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.1206 OF 2021
Date:11.03.2022
Between:
Kandhadi Anji Reddy S/o.Papi Reddy, Aged about 41 yrs, Occu : Business, R/o.1-55/1, Rampalli Dayara Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District
…..Petitioner
And Sri Aravind Kumar, I.A.S, The Commissioner, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Tarnaka, Hyderabad & others
…..Respondents
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.1206 OF 2021
ORDER:
This contempt is filed alleging that the directions issued by this Court on 26.12.2019 in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.26821 of 2019 are not complied.
__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J
11th March, 2022 Rds
2 issues framed by the court
Whether respondents committed contempt for non-compliance with orders dated 26.12.2019.
Whether the petitioner is concerned with the layout alleged by persons against whom he filed a complaint.
Kandhadi Anji Reddy
Sri Aravind Kumar
P.NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
