The High Court at Hyderabad granted permission to withdraw Writ Petition No. 4266 of 2019, thereby dismissing it as withdrawn. Consequently, pending Contempt Cases Nos. 537 and 658 of 2020, along with miscellaneous petitions, were closed.
Permission granted to withdraw W.P. No. 4266 of 2019, dismissed as withdrawn; Contempt Cases closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO
FRIDAY. THE FOURTH DAYOF MARCH
TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEP, NAVEENRAO
CONTEMPT CASENOS:537AND 658 OF 2020 AND WRIT PETITION NO:4266 OF 2019
7 0F 2020
(Contempt Case U/s. 10 to1 2 ofContemptof CourtsAct, to punish the Respondents herein forviolating, disobeyingtheOrders of the High Courldated O1tO3l2O19 in IANo.1of 2019 in WP No.4266 of 2019)
{ I \
| B9 | ldesrL f.,to'oDC-at,r'':arS O.'c_OAb-_ e-a""aO"l28r'ea'sc(al.lbJSl'"<s (iolZ.e2€';-c:o-''.,; -cerr'oe''['lc |
P-iT1ONER |
|---|---|---|
| ' 2 - I ' 6 - a o |
(r .r r s,\a!.0.1l.:: 'e ",,I;f"-i';;;6J-r sso-r'o'Pr:e' Cvberabad'RI(D Str:r M'.5.1'1v:3.1--t:=.^;l:.::';il .hp,ct,to-e^-" ,;.:;.,.. -'.,-. /r, r,.a , .-,^.,. ;j Commr5Soirer;ile Disirict .,-^,o.,,..r';.rJ1,5-''' l'o^ :; freoet.ro':.'.-",-, -'-..,..a- o.-t :):e.-:1.i-" : aommi!soner::e' ..: ".:, 1 ,rAVsr.lr, "i-:,.:,li,.rq.:c,r r^a2PrtLcr'e'S, iff;i,tiP!':r5:rtoioa'rsaIieci" District i',LX,llt");l'-9;':j;'^c1'llil; I-l:'";,,l"a:lr:ce'::eic- Fz-;r (LoY/ s!'e' r' R€ddvDrslrc: !,o vra/f-:a-l.l:::,il-i |
'j:l.l !t,''i,-";,"l'i't'i'o''>larsa-ao RanqaRecS!! s:1':' .,--.<--_ <-:.,-:: ,^9lj#-il"iij,o-",-'.,,"."' ii-,i,i',-:-"t'"ts'?r:-i:acR;r;3 RedCYDstict n1rS.Jl-a':rJ-iacS o :lK-or'Io ,"0'oai"t'o :-c1:Ell ',ce :--'t :;:-;i r.(c-I'e rv?g'''-a'< ,"",--.1.r;-,,':-:: :''lJ:r':' Cs:,ct |
| For For For |
thePetitioner: SRI AADESHVARMA' Advocate theRespondent Nosl to7 : GPFOR HOME theRespondentNo8 : GP FORREVENUE |
cc No .658OF2020:
(Contempt CaseU/s 10 to 12 of Contemptof Courts Act' to punish the Respondentsherein for violating'disobeyingthe Orders of the High Courtdated 01tO3l2O19in lA No.1 of 20'19)
{JcNecrl;:
For thePetitioner: SRIAADESH VARMA,Advocate
For the RespondentNos.'lto 7 : GP FOR HOME
For the RespondentNo.8: GP FOR REVENUE
2 l.o ,,^,""'ryn1,r I),'d(r/ S'-r /, 1 .nllr,r r,. nC, 4;,,;l'll i,rrc.Slalro'r lrolr5g 61661., Itlt,l.z f.1.,, , "',1:ltan s".',U,,,,,",.,nn..,
I I i
wP NO.4266 0F 2019:
r'1 ' .1 1:
1 y€drs Bagn, : '.'|:.... :.: .: r0
)-?
| 23.'1ord.YcusufS/'c. CCCI- C-S].:5sQ L Cocry,Faakunun'ra |
l.tcxd.Al,agecj27years .t9-J-,I069 C2(./:.'CO1a ,Hyderabad-500053. |
|
|---|---|---|
| PETITIONER.S | ||
| ::.):.,a: oFTelan Home |
A\D ganaRepby department, itsPrncrpal Secreiarlat, |
5
rl
!
Petition underArlicle 226 of the Constitutionof lndia, prayingthatin the circumstinLLs siateOin tne affidavitfiled therewith,the High Courtmay be.pleasedto Lsiej writ, order ordirection,more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus' Jeclarino the action of Res,ondentNo.4to 10 in threatening and not allowing the n"tilinn.-rr into the Raieev GandhilnternationalAirport, Hyderabadat Shamshabadto io'in"ii 6riin".. of tixidrivingand picking and dropping the passengers,and also Liulng t"li" cnailansfor no wro'ngcommitted andthreatening.of booking falsecriminal "rri nesoonOentO"ttion No.10ind in taking bindi"nqinto over illegal tfie petiloners for no custodyof, the vehrcles cause and reason in connivance aS of rllegarthe "ir,,rliruanoaoarnstthe la'.i and also in violation of the fundamental rights and the Ion.t,tr.it'on'oru'rrnteescontained in Article 14, 19, Article 300 A of the constitutionof inoii'i.orniing to overreaching of thepowers and c-onsequent'yissue a direct'onnot to iii"ii o"t"i","oi"d over and ;top the petrtionersfrom carrying on their business of running taxis in thepremises of RGIA lnternational Airport
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI AADESH VARMA, Advocate
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 to I : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & l0 : GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following; COMMON ORDER
-2-
'i
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE Nos.537 & 658 0F 2020 AND
WRIT PETITION N o.4266 0F 2019
COMMON ORDER:
Learned counsel lbr the petitioners in both the contempt cases sr-rbmits that the petitioners do r-rot intend to prosecute W.p.No.4266 of 20 19 ar-rd seeks permission ol the Court to withdrarv the u,rit pctition.
Pcrmission is accorded. Accordingly, W.p.No.4266 o1' 20 19 is dismissc.d as ri ithcirau'n.
He also sr-rbmirs tl-rett in vicu, ol thc u.ithdrau,:rl of W.p.No ,4266 ol 2019, no ordci:s are rcquired to be passed in the conternpl cascs.
Accordingll-, thc Contempt Cases are closed. pencling
misceilaneolts petitions, if anr., shall stand closecl.
Sd/-K,SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGIS RAR //TRUE COPY//
SEC ER
To
O 6,Y".,11" prasad, ACp RGt Airpoit iiraffic), RGt police station/Ranga Reddy RGr Airport (Law and order), RGr porice station,
t Rfl'J}[5,fi%,3,Io|[l,o"t
9, 9nu 9Qto SriAadesh Varria,nOv<jcate iCjpucr '' l$,irY"t to GP lor Home' High court for the State of relangana at Hyderaoad
to GP for Revenue, High court for the srate of relangana, Hyderabad " ,'d;r3tt
'12. Two CD Copies
'13 One Spare Coov
*Kj L. A'
i I
HIGHCOURT
DATED:04/03/2022
COMMONORDER
.ta ,., \s\L S,r.,r'r. <br>/1<o* t s,,l<br>l_t r<br>H ,eE APlaozz ;)
v
wy "r/
CC.Nos.537and 6Y8of 2020 AND wP NO.42660F 2019
DrsMrsstNG THE Wp AS WTHDARWN/AND CLOSING THE CCs
v,-\6\ o\ e9
Petitioners (Tax Drivers)
GP FOR HOME
GP FOR REVENUE
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
