This is an advance order in a writ petition where the High Court allowed the petition and set aside a detention order, directing the release of the petitioner.
The detention order set aside and the petitioner (Varikuppala Prakash) ordered to be set at liberty forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR N GA NA rsil i.itli! i :,rfl,[ 3 :,LTA
FRIDAY, THE TWE rwoi,bj!'nrlJl#rfi?EDf
IiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiyfrpRrl
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUf[I:::
Between:
:ffi::il^.H'J-*
TH E H O NO U RA B LE D R
WR|TpETtTtON NO: 894 OF 2021
AND
Varrikuppala yadaiah, aro
Aged about 50 years, Occ, Civit "r:1.^-lunrjah,, ;!,:Ij!:tfiR/o'H No 4-6, Surtanpurllvrri"p;; Brlilur rVrandar, R R. Districr,
...PETITIONER
- The State of relanoana. Rep. by Spl. chief secretary, - -vivrvr , ' General Administration</sup> lSpl. Law and Orde-r) Depariment
- lhe Commlssioner of police, Rachakonda Commissionerate
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewlth, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more particurarry in the nature of Habeas corpus, declaring the Detention order passed by the Respondent No.2 vide proceedings No. 69/Pd-CELL/CCRB/RKD/2020 Dr. 27t11t202o Rtw c.o, Rt. No. 1324, Generat Administration (special Law and order) Department dt. 07 togl2ozo and confirmation by state of relangana vide G.o.Rt.No.363, dated 13-02-2o21 as illegal, arbitrary and quash the detention order.
(Prayer is amended as per court order dt.23-04-2021 vide lA No.01 of 2021 in wp No.894/2021)
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI L.HARISH
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G.MALLA REDDY, AGP for HOME for ADVOCATE GENERAL
It is ordered as follows:
THEHON'BLE SRI ]USTICEA' RA]ASHEKERREDDY AND THE HON,BLEDT. JU;ii.ESHAMEEM AKTHER
F T
ADVANCEORDER:(Per Hon'bleDr'sA'J)
In the result,the Writ Petition is allowed'The impugned detentionorder vide proceedingsNo 69/PD- CELL/CCRB/RCKD/202O,dated27 'It'2020, passed bv the respondentNo.2, and the consequentialconfirmation ordervide G.o.Rt.No.363,General Administration(Spl' (Law & Order)) Department, dated13.02.2021,passedby Principal Secretaryto Government, GeneralAdministration(Spl, (Law &Order)) Department, Government ofTelangana,are hereby set aside' The respondents are directedto set the detenu, namely Varikuppala Prakash, S/oYadaiah, atliberty forthwith,if he is no
longer required in any othercriminalcase.
(Detailed order follows)
SD/.R.KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I I=-:? SECTION OFFICER
To.'"'t. Th" Sol. Chief Secretary, General Administration.(Spl' Lawand Order) ' o""or-r.i'.uni, stite oi reitangana, Secretariat Hyderabad
IVRC
-d-
HIGHCOURT
ONEDi23l04l2O21
ADVANCEORDER
WP.No.894 of2021
i1E Ii .r4 l*
oo 28 APR 2021
-*t
D ePi.tr.
ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION
tt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the detention order passed against the petitioner violates Article 22 of the Constitution.
Varikuppala Yadaiah
The State of Telangana
Justice A. Rakesh Reddy
Justice D. J. Akthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
