Allowed

Dhumpala Akhila v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Telangana HC23 Apr 2021WP/649/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition under Article 226 allowed. High Court set aside detention order and confirmation order, directing immediate release of detainee Malagani Swarnakar @ Ramesh provided he is no longer required in any criminal case.

What did the court decide?

Detention order and confirmation order set aside; detainee directed to be set at liberty forthwith if not required in any other criminal case.

Dhumpala Akhila Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 649 OF 2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

Dhumpala Akhila, W/o.Malagani Swarnakar @ Ramesh, Aged about^{23 years,} Occufation Housewife, R/o. H.No.16-3-719/1 ,^{EkashilaNagar, Fort Road,} Warangal, Warangal Urban District.

¶10

..PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government,^General Administration Department^(Poll), Secretariat,^Hyderabad.

¶13

2 The Collector and District l\rlagistrate, Jangaon District at Jangaon.

¶14

3 The Superintendent of Jail, Central Prison, Warangal,^{WarangalDistrict.}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of India^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court^{may be pleased} to issue Writ, order, direction^particularly in the nature of^writ of^{Habeas Corpus} directing the respondents to^produce the detenue^{by name Malagani Swarnakar} @ Ramesh, S/o.Pedda Sambaiah, aged 31^years, Occupation Business, R/o,H.No.539, Shambaiahpalle village of Duggondi Mandal, now at Ekashilanagar,^{Fort Road,} Warangal before this Honourable Court and set him at liberty by declaring the detention order dated 3111212020 issued in Proceeds No,P1157212020^{passed by the} 2nd respondent including all consequential orders as illegal and arbitrary.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SOMAVARAPU SATYANARAYANA

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G.MALLA REDDY, AGP FOR HOME /a{

¶19

ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶20

IT IS ORDERD AS FOLLOWS:

¶21

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{A. RAJASHEKER REDDY} AND THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE^{SHAMEEM AKTHER}

¶22

WRIT PETITION NO.649^{OF 2021}

¶23

ADVANCE ORDER:^{(Per Hon'ble Dr'SA,J)}

¶24

In the result, the Writ^{Petition is allowed. The impugned} detention order vide^{Procds.No.P/1572of2020,dated} 31.\2.2020,^passed by the^{respondentNo.2, andthe} consequential confirmation order^{vide G'O.Rt.No'529,General} Adrninistration^{(Spl. (Law} &^{Order)) Department,dated} 08.03.2021,^passed by^{respondentNo.1, are herebyset aside,} The respondents are directed^{to set the detenu, namelyMalagani} Swarnakar @ Ramesh, S/o.^{Pedda Sambaiah,atliberty} forthwith, if he is no^{longer required in any other criminal case'}

¶25

(Detailed order follows)

¶26

SD/.R.KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY// }----

SECTION OFFICER

To,

l.ThePrincipalsecretarytoGovernment,GeneralAdminiStrationDepartment r'pJri SiriJoiTelangdna,^{Secretariat' Hvderabad,} z Yn-" 6"]rJiLi^{ano btitrici'uagisrrare.Jangaon District at Janqaon} 5 +ii; 5;;;;;i"io"nl^{ot Liii,'cZ'iii'iF|.iJnlwaransat' WarangalDistrict (Bv} Soeed Post) + 5ii Cc to^{dri. SomavarapuSatvanaravT'} 19y9:-ol'^IOPUCI 5. Two ccs^{to the AdvocatE"C""ii"r,r-rigfrcourt for the siate of Telangana.(oUT)} 6. Two CD^CoPies.

PN,'I

{

HIGH^COURT

DATED:23/04/2021

ADVANCE^ORDER WP.No.649^o12021

¶37

e STA rA
1 or
k
<br>:l
o-),J 23 rPflts?1
i" /
'y^
--.:/
*

¶38

Allowing^{the WP '}

¶39

4t*<br>A'
<) 4

Dhumpala Akhila v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhumpala Akhila v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Vaishnovi Infratech Ltd. Vs Union Bank of India

Smt.Muthyam Sulochana Vs State of Telangana

M/s Sri Vaishnavi Gardens Vs Union Bank of India

S.Shiva Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Varrikuppala Yadaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Santhosh Singh Vs The State of Telangana