Allowed

S.Shiva Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Apr 2021WP/4376/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a habeas corpus petition seeking the release of Tarun Kumar Sherkhane. The court set aside the detention order dated 28.11.2020 and consequential government orders relying on a previous Division Bench judgment in W.P. No. 1657 of 2021.

What did the court decide?

The detention order in S.B.(I) No.209/PD-6/HYD/2020 dated 28.11.2020 and consequential orders are set aside; the detenu is set at liberty forthwith.

S.Shiva Kumar Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE ST r. o";,; i 3.IE,3i l|hfiif,fli^{Ar HYD ERABAD}

¶2

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWo rHousAND AND rw;N;iorff'

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTIC

¶5

Between:

¶6

WRIT P ETITIO N NO: 4376 0 F 2021

¶7

S,.tJ [x IH r3ili];.?,ti iJi#&,i: iffj,?t:?1 ve^{a rs,} occ ra i ro r, R/o H No 1 3-5 -s 0 r, AND ...PETITIONER

¶8

The state of reranoana, Rep by its principar Secretary to Government, General ^ Adm in istration Depi rtment (p"il l,'5 J.i"ir"rilt]iil"rroro. 2. The Commissioner of 5 : r ii " 5, ri.i ii.iffi $ i;i3 I [: &tl?fr 5affi :,r ff$:.rTr:d?t1i5f u o o i,t,i.t

¶9

...RESPONDENTS

¶10

Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue writ, order, direction particurarry in the nature of writ of Habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce the detenue by name Tarun Kumar sherkhane s/o S. Shiva Kumar, aged about 23 years, occ. c.c rv rechnician, R/o.H.No.13-5501, Dhor Basthi, Jiyaguda, Kuslampura, Hyderabad before this Hon,ble court and set him at liberty by declaring the detention order 29.11 .2020 issued in proceedings SB(l).No.209/PD-6/HYD/2020 passed by the 2nd respondent and ail the consequential orders passed by the 1st respondent i.e,, G.o.Rt.No.2g7 General Administration Spl. (Law and order) Department, dated s.2.202i as illegal, arbitrary. Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A. PRABHAKAR RAO

¶11

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G.MALLA REDDy, AGp for HOME for

¶12

ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶13

IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

¶14

AND

¶15

ut,EJI9,43?5!fJ.a21

¶16

Learned^{counselfor the petitioner submits that the lis in the present} writ^{petitionis squarely covered by the orderpassed by the DivisionBench of} this court^{in W'P'No'1657 of2O2Ldated 12'04'2021' and the said writ} petition^{was allowedand the detention order was set asideand the detenu} therein^{was released'}

¶17

Learned^{Assistant Government Pleader for Home'appearingfor} learned^{Additional Advocate General does not the dispute the same'}

¶18

In view^{of the sarne' and for the reasons alike as recordedin} w.P.NO.1657^{of 202t dated 12'04'2021' this writ petitionis allowed' and the} detention^{order in S'B'(I) No'209/PD-6ll1YDl2020dateci28'11'2020 passed} by the^{2'd respondent- commissioner of Police' F{yderabad City' HyderabaC} Dietrict,^{approved by the Governmentvide G'O Rt'No' 1908'G'A' (Spl' (Law} & orderi^{Depaftment dated08'12'2020'and confirmed by the 1't respondent} -^{Principle SecretarytoGovernmentvide G'O'Rt'No 287 General} Administration^{(Spl. (Law & Order)Departmentdated 05'02'202fis set} aside, and^{consequently the detenu -Tarun Kumar Sherkhane s/o Shiva} Kumar shall^{be set at liberty fofthwith, if not required in any other case'}

¶19

Interlocutory^{applications pending,if any'shall standclosed'} No order

¶20

as to costs,

¶21

//JUDGMENT^FOLLOWS//

¶22

SD/.R.KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANT REGIST R //TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER

¶23

To, t,ThePrincipatSecretarytoGovernment,GeneralAdministrationDepafiment lP;ll) Staie of^{Telangina. Secretariat.Hy-derabad'} z f n"e'co-ri,rir ission"i^{oi poti.e.H yd era bad'city. H yd erabadDi strict.} 5. ri.i" SrJiiii"tenoent^{ot Lui6. Cri"*njtguda 'Hyderabad. HyderabadDistrict (Bv} Speciai Messenger) +. on"-C-C to Sri A:Prabhakar^{Rao, Advocate[oPUC]} 5. iil ccsio ir.l"^{Advocate General, High courtfor the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad. [OUT] 6. Two CD CoPies CHRI,+

HIGH COURT

DATED:2310412021

ADVANCE ORDER

W.P.No.4376 of 2021

1 ilE Srh rci
(
c--)
L) 23 Amm2l i<br>/
ai ':.. .. . --
\a:.-a=.:=,

¶29

ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶30

')rt
oLl
13 I

S.Shiva Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Shiva Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Vaishnovi Infratech Ltd. Vs Union Bank of India

Smt.Muthyam Sulochana Vs State of Telangana

M/s Sri Vaishnavi Gardens Vs Union Bank of India

Dhumpala Akhila Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Varrikuppala Yadaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Santhosh Singh Vs The State of Telangana