Writ petition by a catering firm challenging a blanket ban order was dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner agreed to the respondents' settlement proposal to remove the firm from the blacklist.
Petitioner granted liberty to approach the court if settlement fails; other-wise writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 8544 OF 2021
Between:
Sri Sai Krupa Catering and Maintenance Services, R/o H.No..1-B-43, Raiendra Nagar,Hylerabad. Rep by Sri N Rajender prasad, S/o N Venkaiah,'Aqed: 45years, Fl/o H No. 1-8-43, Rajender Nagar, Apert Ranga Reddy District.- ...PETITIONER
AND
2 Telanganal state. lnstitution o-f Rural Development, Rep. by its chief Executive Officer, Police Ouarters, Rajendra Naqar lvahdal, ttvderaOad.
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of the 3rd respondent, in issuing the office order No. 1084/A3/ESTT/TStRD/2016, dated 30.03.2021, hotding that the petitioner-firm was in block list for a period of 5 years, without giving any notice or an opportunity to the petitioner to represent his case, by duly cancelling the agreement dated 1s.o2.2017 which was extended from time to time till the impugned order was issued by the 3rd respondent, dated 30.3.2021, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the guidelines issued of the Agreement executed by the 4th respondent with the petitioner, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of A(icle 14 and 21 of the constitution of tndia and set aside the same, by hording that the petitioner is erigibre and entifled to get extension of the Agreement for the purpose of sai Krupa catering and Maintenance Service on such terms and conditions of the Agreement dated 1s.2.2o1z,which was extended from time to time.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to
suspend the operat )n of the Office Order No. 1084/A3/ESTT/TSIRD/2016,dated 30.03.2021, issued Iy the 3rd respondent,with a directionto the 3rd respondentto continue thepetition:r as Sri Sai KrupaCatering and Maintenanoe Serviceon the same terms and con litionsof the Agreementdated 15.2.2017, pending disposal of the above writpetitio r, pending disposalof the abovewrit petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
AND
Sri Sai Krupa( .ateringandMaintenanceServices'R/o H No l -B-43'Rajendra ij.-ri.nuaitro, o. n""p nvSri ru Rajender Prasad' S/o N Venkaiah'Aged: ;;y';i;,'Rv; H 'lo.t-e'-+ehajender Ndga,Apert Ranga Reddv District ..Resp6ndenU Petitioner
Petition under iection151 cPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin su )port of the petition,the High court may be pieased to vacate theinterimorderdate(o6to4t2o21madeinl.ANo1/2021inW'P'N:854412021,
Counsel for thePetiti'rner:SRl.CH VENKATRAMAN
Counsel forthe Resp, 'ndents:THE ADDL ADVOCATEGENERAL FOR GP FOR PANCHAYAIRAJ ANDRURAL DEVELOPMENT
The Court made thefc llowing: OROER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
I
Writ Petition No.8544 of ZOZL
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter dt.2o.12.2021 to the Registrar(Judicial) High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, seeking permission to withdraw this Writ Petition stating that the respondents have agreed to remove the petitioner-Firm lrom blacklist and settle the pending bills of the petitioner. However, liberty is sought by the petitioner to approach this Court in the event the matter is not settled with the respondents.
shall stand closed.
SD/.T.TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .\
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, ''l . One CC to SRl. CH VENKAT RAMAN Advocate tOpUCl ? QneCCto SRl. ADDLADVOCATEGENIERAL, A'dvocate tOpUCl 3. Two ccs to GP for Panchayat Raj an{Rurar Deveropmeni, High'court for the State of Telangana at Hydeabad. iOUTI 4. Two CD Copie-s 5. One Spare Copy TR BS tlix
HIGH COURT
DAIED:3O11212021
ORDER
WP.No.8544 of 2021
-F-::t 'S tATt:-1 o
,t Y\C
q$it l
-fD tt,trtol<br>,)
,l)
I DISMISSINGT {E WRIT FETITIOru AS WITHDRAV WITHOI}T COSTS 'N
Sri Sai Krupa Catering and Maintenance Services, Rep by Sri N Rajender prasad
Telangana State Government
Telangana State Institution of Rural Development
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
