Disposed

P.Bharat Bhushan v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited.

Telangana HC24 Dec 2021WP/35616/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposed of three writ petitions filed for service connections. The court, relying on prior judgments, directed the respondents to provide power supply service connections to the petitioners within four weeks, subject to ongoing litigation.涉及党电供应许可及 writ jurisdiction.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to receive applications and provide individual service connections to the petitioners within four weeks.

P.Bharat Bhushan Vs Telangana State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY ,THE^{TWENTY FOURTH DAYOF DECEX/BER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYONE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR}

¶6

WRIT PETI^{TION NO: 35616 0F202',1}

¶7

Between:

¶8

P.Bharat Bhushan,^{S/o Late Sri P Balraj, Aged41} years, R/o.PIot^No.162, Ayyappa Society,^{Iriladhapur,Hyderabad-500081'}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation^{Limited., Vidyut} Soudlia Somajiguda, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Chairman-cum-Managing^Director

¶12

The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

¶14

The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Ivladhapur, Hyderabad.

¶15

Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tank Bunk Road, Hyderabad.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may^-oe pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of wRrr of lvANDAlvus directing the respondents to act in aciordance with law and to jrovide service connections arong with erectricar meters to the buirding constructed Ln prot bearing No 162, admeasuring 4'1 7 _Sq.yards in Sy.No.'1 1rB ro 1ir1t part or sy No.fi situated ln Sri Swamy Ayyappa Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Khanamet village seriringampaily rvrandar, R.R.District, witho;t being intruenceo' uf- ilre instructions of the 5th respondent.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶19

Petition under Section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, fl',J iig';tor,1 may be preased to direct the respondents to provide service connections" atong with erectricar meters to the building constructed on ptot bearing No..162, rJr"i.rring 4.1 7 Sq.yards in Sv. No. 1118 ro 11/11 part of sv.No-11 situJted i" s]r s*rrv Ayyappa cooperative Housing societv Limited, Khanamet rirr"ge. .i_eiil,"ffi;;i,; Nrandar, R.R.District, withour being inftuenced by the proceedinjs of stn reiporiOlrir.

¶20

Counsel for the petitioner:SRI. B SRAVAN KUMAR the Respondent Nos. r to a, dni. d.'vl'r,roo neoov, sc FoR fSSffiJI., for the Respondent No. 5: sRt. sAMpArH SiXi;", REDD', sc FoR 'RABHAKAR

¶21

The Court made the following:

¶22

( (

¶23

HONO IRABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR I^,RIT PETITIO N No. 35616 of 2021

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This Wri Petition is filed for the followrng relief:

¶26

¶27

".,. to iss le ar,]' appropriate Writ, order or direction more particular y one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring he respondents to act in accordance with law and to provide service connections along with electrical meters to the buil ing constructed on plot bearing No. 162 admeasun 1g 417 sq. yards in Sy.No.11/8 to 11/1l(parti of Sy.No.11 situated in Sri Swamy Ayyappa Cooperative Housing S rciety Limited, Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Malda-1, I .R. District, without being influenced by the instructior s of the Sft respondent arld to pass such other order. . . .."

¶28

2 . When th ) matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned Couns rl for the petitioner that the issue raiserl in the present Writ P tition is squarely covered by the orders passed by this Court in WP.No.264oi of 2021 dt.25.10.2021 and WP.No.21 100 r f 2019 dt.25.09.2O19.

¶29

Sri R.^r'inod Reddy, Iearned^{Standing Counsel for} Telangana 51 a.te Power^{Distribution CompanyLimited} appearing for:espondents^{1 to 4 and Sri Sampath Prabhakar} Reddy, learne C Standing^{Counsel for Greater Hyderabad} Municipal Cor >oration,^{appearingfor respondent No'5' do not} dispute the af,^{,resaid submission'}

¶30

In view )f the above,^{for the reasons alike in the said} order, this^{Mrit Petition isdisposed ofdirecting the} respondents^{1o receive the applicationof the petitioner and} release servic^{) connectionto the petitionerr'vithin a periodof}

¶31

four^{(4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order'} and the same^{shall be subject to further directionthat may be} issued by the^{State of Telangana or the Apex Court in the} litigation^{pending before itarising out of theorder} dt.l2.Og.2Ol2 in^{Writ Petition No.20407 of 2008 and batch'} No co sts.

¶32

) Consequently,^{miscellaneous petitions pending, if anv'} shall stand closed.

¶33

¶34

SD/-NAGALAXSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

To,

The Chairman-cum-lvlanaging^{Director,Telangana State Southern Power} ol.tribrtion Corporation^{iimitio.' Vidyut soudha-somajiguda' Hvggg?u9:}

¶39

Z. ih" Srp"rintending^{Engineer, TelanganaState.Southern Power Distribution} - c;;p;;.til; Limitei, Vidvut soudha, -somajisuda' Hvderabad' S. ifre Olvisional ifre Olvisional Olvisional^{Engineer,Telangana State SouthernPowerDistribution}

¶40

S. ifre Olvisional ifre Olvisional Olvisional^{Engineer,Telangana State SouthernPowerDistribution}

¶41

Corporation^{Limited, Kukatpally, Hyderabad'} ^. .

¶42

+. ihu7."irtrnt^{DivisionalEriEnler,',telangana state southern PowerDistribution} Corporation^{Limited, Madhapur, Hyderabad} . .

¶43

The Commissioner,^{cr"ri"iffyA"i"badlr4unicipalCorporation' Tank Bunk Road'} Hyderabad.

¶44

O;; CC^{to Sri. B Sravan Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶45

;. o;; cc to^{sri.R. Vinod Reddv' sc for TSSPDCLtoPucl}

¶46

B. o;; CC to^{Sri. Sampath PrabhakarReddy, SC for GHMC IOPUC]}

¶47

Two CD^CoPies.

¶48

(Along With a Copy of orders^{off: 25110121inWP264Ot121and dt: 25/09i19 in} wP 21100/19)

PN/ bs

HIGH COURT

DATED:2411212021

ORDER

WP.No.35616 ot 2021

.--.1:-::!.-r
;iru sufi \ <br>C
i
AODffi

¶55

Disposing of tt e WP Without costs.

¶56

;/-
./''a-
€
a\ c
/,
'^f

¶57

THE HON'BLES RI JUSTICE^{T. VINOD KUMAR}

¶58

WRIT PETITION No,26401 OF 2O21

¶59

ORDER:

¶60

This Writ Petition is filed lbr the lollorving reliel:

¶61

".. . tc' issue an appropriate Writ, order or clirection rnore panicularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondr'nts to act in accordance with larv and to l)rovide service corlrccrions along rvith electrical nletres to the truilding construcrcd orr l)lor bcaring No.879, adnrcasuring -'l ll Sq. Yards in Sr. ,.r.ll l;l to lli lli Pan ol'Sy'. \o.11 situatc,l in Sri Srvanrr A,,r;rppa Cooperative llousinr: Societi, I intiteC. Kltiinarntt',ililge. Scrilirrganrpally' ,1andal. ll,.lt. l)istrict. *,ithout berrrg inlluenced bv llre instrrrctions ol tlre 5"' respondent .....'

¶62

When tlrc rrirlter is Iaken up. ir is subnritred bt' the learned Counsel for the 1-.ctitioner that the issue raised in the prescnt Wril Petition is squirrelv covered by the order dated 25.09,20 I9 passeil b1. this Coufi in W.P. No.2l100 of 2019

¶63

Learned Government Pleader appearing for Energy/respondent No.1. Sri R. Vinod Reddy, leamed Standing Counsel lor Telangana State Power DistribLrtion Company Limited appearing lor respondenrs 2 to 4 and Sri Sarnpath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Sranding Counscl lor^(lreatcl I-lr rlerabad Municipal Corporation. appear ing ic.,r. respondent \o.5. rio not dispute the allrcsaid subnrisrion.

¶64

In vicu,of tlrc above, t'o r the rcasons alikc irr the said orcler. thrs Wrjt Petition is disposed ol directing the respondenrs trr rglsss(. individual sen.ice connection to the petirioner witlrin a pe.od ol lbur (4) weeks fiom the date of receipr of a copy ol this order. and rhe

¶65

same shall le subjecr ro further direction thar may be iss{.red by the State of Tei lngana or the Apex Court in the litigation pending before it arising or.: olthe order dated lZ.Og.2Ol2 in Writ petition No.20407

¶66

of2008 and batch. No cosrs.

¶67

Miscr llaneous petirions pending il any, shall stand closed.

SDA T.TIRUMALA DEVI

,TRUE COPY//

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

.iL-,

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1, The Chairm: r-cum-Managing Director, Telangana State Southern power Drstribution⁽ orooralion Lr"mi6d, ViOVri SorOn:, ioia;,gr,cia, Hyderabad 2, The superinr :niling Engrneer, r'elan6lnaHitJ so"ri'nern power Disrribution ., !.o1o91at1on^{I jmrtei, vidyi.rt Sbuonl."s"rn"]istrl} ;voeraoad J. I ne Urvtsroni I Engtneer. Telangana State Sluthern'power Oist.ibLrtion .^{!:o'porationI imited, Kukatpay, Hyderabad.}

¶75

The Assistan Divisional erig naer'feranga-;a state southern power Distributjon .^{C,orporationtimrted, Madna-pur.HyoerioZO- -'}

¶76

the Commis roner, Greater Hydeiabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bunk Road, Hyderabad.

¶77

9 Qn" QQ^{to Sr B. Sravan Kumar, Advocate} IOpUCI J Qne QC^{to Sr R Vinod Reddy,} scloCidSpddi ropucl

¶78

one cC ro sr sampath praofiirar R;&y,-st FdnEnME,lopuct

¶79

(Along with a :opy of order in W.p.No.21 100 of 2019, dated 25.09.20.19.)

¶80

Two CD CoolrS 10.One Spare b(py CHR

¶81

)N.\k

¶82

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 21100 0F 2019

¶83

ORDER:

¶84

This writ petition is filed aggrieved by action of respondents in not receiving the application and not releasing the power supply to the petitioner,s house at premises bearing Plot No.350, admeasuring 4lZ square yards in Sy.No. 11/14 to 17/18 situated at Khanamet Village, Seriiingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶85

Learned counsel lor the petitioner submits that in simiiar circumstances, this Court disposed of WP.No.22849 of 2018. dated 05-07-2Ot8.

¶86

Heard Sri R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 to 5 and Sri Sampath prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.6.

¶87

In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the said order, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to receive the application of the petitioner for electric power supply connection by complying all the norms as required by the respondent-Company. As and when such application is made, the respondentCompany is directed to provide individual serwice connection to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of submission of such application and

¶88

¶89

provision of such power supply connection shall be subject to fi rther direction that may be issued by the State of Tela rgana or the Supreme Court in the litigation pending be ore it arising out of the judgment dated 12-09 2Ol2 in WP.No.2O407 of 2OO8 and batch. Pending mis:ellaneous applications if any shal1 stand c1o sed.

¶90

A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J

¶91

25-09-20 19 Nvl

P.Bharat Bhushan v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Bharat Bhushan v. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bandam Sarojana Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Jally Manjula Vs The State of Telangana

Haigreeva Dsp Infra Ventures Pvt. Ltd., Vs State of Telangana

M/s. V.R. Infra Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others

M/s. Vaishnavi Constructions Vs The State of Telangana

Vutukuru Suresh Kumar Reddy and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others