This order disposes of Writ Petition No. 8210 of 2019 as not pressed. The petitioner, an advocate, sought leave to withdraw the petition after tendering an apology to the concerned court to quiet the matter.
The writ petition was disposed of as not pressed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SECONDDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEB. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION N o : 8210OF 2019
Between:
Jacob lr/udi, S/o Janaiah, agedabout 38 years' Occ:Advocate,Fl/o Fla Prashanthi Pranghan,Doctdrs Colony, Kothapet, Hyderabad-5000035.
t No. G-4,
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith, the HighCourt may be pleasedto issue a Writ order or directionmore particularly directingone in a nature of writof Prohibition declaring the actionof the RespondentNo.1 in issuing the noticedated 08-02-2019 for contemptof court undersection228 of IPCand under 345 of CR.P.C. is withoutjurisdiction, illegal,arbitrary andunconstitutiona I againstthe principalsof naturaljustice, fundamentalrightsguaranteed underarticle'14, 19(1)(g)and 21 of the Constitution of lndia,consequentlydirect the 2nd respondentto initiatenecessary action against the 1strespondent on the representationof the petitionerdated'15-02- 2019.
IA NO : 1 OF 2019
Petition under section15'1 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition,the High court may be pleasedto suspend the notice dated 08-02-2019issued by the 1sr respondentfor contemptof court under section 228 of IPC and345 of CR.PC.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl.M. VIJAYAKUMARGOUD
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1 : NONEAPPEARED
Counsel for the RespondentNo.2: SRI J' ANILKUMAR (SC FOR TSHC)
The Court made the following:ORDER
Item No,31
THE HON'BLE THE CHIE F JUSTIC E HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSE N REDDY
W.P.No.82l0 OF 2 019
ORDER: Oer rhe Hon'ble rhe Chief Justice Hima Kohli)
pending applications, if any.
SD/. T. TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTMR
\
t.-., N_,,. //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 Sml Kavitha Karnati, Occ: Judicial Officer, Rt/o JFCN/., Spl. Ir,4obile Court cum Vl |qdl: Junior_Civil Judge cum VI Addl. tvletropolitan lr,4ai;istrate, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telanqana State.
CHR
\ 4--
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210612021
ORDER
*?
-w
I H El Srlr r(
_).
oo 10 J'JN ?.tl?.l 1,.
\ t-
tr
-v
{.
W.P.No.8210 of 2019
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS NOT PRESSED WITHOUT COSTS
$fl,'
3 issues framed by the court
Whether leave can be granted to withdraw the writ petition regarding a contempt notice.
Whether the writ petition pressed for decision by the petitioner.
How to dispose of the writ petition as not pressed by the petitioner.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Jacob I/udi
Kavitha Karnati
Registrar (Vigilance), High Court for the State of Telangana
Hima Kohli
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
