In a writ petition, the petitioner sought directives to register an FIR under CrPC Section 154 based on an unregistered complaint. The petition was dismissed on the petitioner's application allowing withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiqtion)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
wRtT PETIT|ON NO, 7893 0F 2021
Between:
Sunkari Narsaiah, S/o Bhadraiah, aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.1-23lC1 , Koraveedi Village and Mandal, Mahabubabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
'l0.Kotumuri Nagamani, W/o Venkateswarlu, aged about 40 years, R/o Koraveedj Village and Mandal, Mahabubabad District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.2 and 3 in non taking the departmental action against the respondent No.6, who non-followed the directions of Criminal Procedure Code Uisec.154 Cr.P.C and non non-registering the FIR against the respondent No.7 to 12 and others basing on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the violation of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take departmental action against the respondent No.6 to foltow the direction of Criminal Procedure Code U/Sec.1 54 Cr.P.C and to register the FIR
against the respondent No,7 to 12 and others basingon the complaint lodged by the petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take action against the respondent No.6 to follow the direction of Criminal Procedure Code U/Sec.154 Cr.P.C and to register the FIR against the respondent No.7 to 12 and others basing on the complaint lodged by the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 12: -
The Coud made the following: ORDER
IHE HON'BtE SRI JUSTICE ABH'NAND KUMAR SHAY'I.'
w RI T PETITION No.7 89 3 of2 021
ORDER:
Leorned counser oppeoring for the petitioner requesrs the Court io permit the peiitioner to wilhdrow ihrs wri.f petilron wiih o iberly Ic pursue hrs remedies tn occordonce wiih low. 2. Per mrssion s cccordec.
gronting liberty os proyed for. No costs,
Pendin g miscelloneous petilions, if ony, sholl stond closed
\
SD/.K.AMMAJI AsslsrANr Rfi]lslAR //TRUE copy// 1 SECTTON trFrrCeR \
To,
N/P DDN
HIGH COURT
DATED:1310812021
ORDER
WP.No.7893 o12021
c
tl y
:)
i.) 1 S St-P 2$21 c
I'J
,?. * ,//
lf3ni.'i{.
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunkari Narsaiah
The State of Telangana
The Director General of Police, Telangana State
The Superintendent of Police, Mahabubabad
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mahabubabad
The Station House Officer, Kuravi Police Station
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
