The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition and a review petition challenging an Industrial Tribunal award because the 2nd respondent appeared via videconferencing during the hearing and subsequently failed to attend, resulting in default dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STA-I!,Ol TELANGANA Ar HyDERABAD (Speciat originat J;ri";;;;;i ^,
TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER
TWO THOUSAND AND rWrr.rIV ONr'
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT P ETI TION NO: 146680 F 2008
Between:
'1 . The Depot A,4anager, APSRTC, Bus Depot, Warangal_ll.
..,PETITIONERS
AND
l The Presiding officer, rndustriar rribunar-cum- Labour court at warangar.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the High c"rrt;;;6u';ilaseo to issue writ, order or direction. more particurarry one in the nature of writ of ce(iorari by calling all the records pertaining to the Awaid in lD No.53 0f 2005 dated 30.08.2007 by the Hon'ble rndustriar rribunir-cum-Labour court, warangar, *ni.n 1, pririrr.',"o in G.o Rt.No.2370 of Labour Emproyment rraining ano Factiries (Lab-t)-DJpartment dated 20.10.2007 and set aside the iame as iilegai, arbitrary r"o .Iniirivio [r
WPMP. NO:1 8952 oF 2008
Petition under section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, rhe iiigi court may be preased to susfena thre operation of Award in rD No.53 of 2005 dat;d 30.08.20b2 oy tne Honrnle rloustriar Tribuna l-cum-Labour Court, Warangal, which was published in C.O.ni.flo.ZSlO ot Labour Employment rraining and Factories (Lab-r) Department dated 20.io.2oo7, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT. p RAJANI REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC
Counsel forthe Respondent No. 1: Gp FOR LABOUR
The Court made the following:
I
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSH,AVILI
WRIT PETITIONNo.14668of 2008
ORDER:
When the motteris tokenup for heoring, it ls noticed thot the presenlwritpetilionisfiledchollengingtheoworddoted30.08.200T possed in l.D.No.53 of 2005 ondthe soid owordwos in fovour of the 2nd respondent.However,the writ petition is dismissedfor defoult ogoinst the 2nd respondenton 25.03.2015ond no steps ore tokento see thot thewrit petltionis restored ogoinstthe 2nd respondenl'ln the obsence of the2no respondeni, this writ petilion connot be odjudicoted onmerits.
Accordingly, thewrit petitionis djsmissed. No costs'
Pending miscellqneouspeiitions, if ony, sholl stond closed'
SD/. B .SATYAVATHI ASSISTAN T REGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// 6,
SECTIONOFFICER
\
To,
1 . The PresidingOfficer, lndustrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court at Warangal' (with records if any)
2 U;1,';il;;.t.e nui"nl Reddv' Advocate[oP-uc] 3. Two ccsto GP for l"b""]:;idh'i;;;toi t" stut" of relansana[oUT] 4 Two CDCoPies.
PI,l s;/ d
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/09/2021
ORDER
WP.No.14668 of 2008
1 'rle S I4 ,-(.
a'i
{ oo 2I 0st?0?1 I
.',r.1 r;..,^.".;1,i"
-:.---.,.;;;=-
Dismissing the WP Without costs.
<br>
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Bus Depot, Warangal
The Senior Manager (O) Rural, A.p.S.R.T.C., Hanamkonda
The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court at Warangal
K.R.Reddy
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
