This short order notes that the learned counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw a writ petition challenging a land regularization order. The court granted permission, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Permission to withdraw granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO:42099 OF 2018
Between:
V. Gopinath Rao, S/o V,Dhondu Rao, Aged about 64 years, Occ: Chartered Accountant, No 2-2-6471125lA, G-4, Sagarika Apartments, Central Excise Colony, Bagh Amberpet, HYderabad
...PETrroNER
AND
...RES'ONOENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the HighCourt may be pleased to issue an order or direction moreparticularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the Respondent No.2 inissuing the Order Dated '10.05.2018in Proceedings No.HMDAL028891/LRS/GT[(P|g/HMDA/20'15-16regularizing the Plot Nos.1, 2. 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13,21 , 22, 23,24, 25, 29 and 30, admeasuring2446.97 sq.mts (Net Plot Area is 2303.26) in Sy.No.28/A,situated atParvathapurVillage' Peerzadiguda tr/unicipality, Ghatkesar Mandal,Ranga Reddy Districtto the Respondent Nos.3 to 7 basing on the allegedRegisteredSale Deed submittedby them who are claiming to be thepurchasersof abovesaid plots from its previous owners Tayaba Fatima and others which ariseout of land admeasuring 3000sq.yds out of the total land of Ac.2.18 Gts, Sy.No.2BlA,Parvathapur Village, Peerzadiguda Municipality, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrictduring the subsistence of Orders Dated 29.11.2011 in 1.A.No.293412011in O.S.No.724i2011on the file of Xl Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy Districtat L.B.Nagar and without considering the Representations Dated 17.12.2015,06.01.20'16and23.O2.2018 submitted by the Petitioner to the Respondent No.2 asarbitrary, illegal, unjustifiedand in violation of the procedure laid down under Law andconsequently direct the Respondent No-2 to
cancel the Regularization Order Dated 10.05.2018 in Proceedings No.HMDAL 028891/LRS/ GTK/P|g/HMDA 12015-16 in respect of above said ptots. lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order Dated 10.05.2018 in Proceedings No.HMDAL028891/t-RS/c1(ptg/HtvDA/ 2015-16 passed by the Respondent No.2, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S. PRABHAKAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1:
GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DE,VELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V. NARSIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICD T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITI ON No.4 O99 of 2018
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the
Court to withdraw the Writ petition.
Granting permission as sought for, the Writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
SD/.K.ONESIM
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY'
\
SECTION OFFICER
To 1. One CC to SriS. PrabhakarReddy,Advocate[OPUCI 2. rwoCcs tocP ior vrunlc'iiaiIJ"initt"iionai19.t!-an Development'High - Court toi tne State of Teladgana at Hyderabad [OUT]- - . ^- s. onu Cc toSri V. NarasimniGouo, Sc roR HMDA [oPUC]
CHR
L{
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 410912021
ORDER
Z
oo 0 5 0cT20?{ a)
c
9r.qP/^TC
W.P.No.42099 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
J
---.-s
V. Gopinath Rao
State of Telangana
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
Kuntala Suresh Kumar
Panga Chandashekar Reddy
Akula Hussain Babu
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
