The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus declaring respondents' interference with his property possession illegal. The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No 32921 0F 2018
Between:
V.B. Rangaiah, S/o. Late V. Rangaiah, Aged about 51years, Occ: Business, RVo. Plot No.24lMlG, Dharmareddy Cotony, Phase-ll, Kukatpally, Ll3Ei1??3*.*
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction,more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of therespondentsNo.3 in forciblyinterferingwith peaceful possession and enjoyment of thepetitioner'spropertybearing H No.lMlG- 24, Dharmareddy Colony, Phase-ll,Hydernagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad is illegal, arbitrary and in violation ofprinciples ofnaturaljustice consequently directthe respondents topermit thepetitioner to enjoyand utilize the premises.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents topermit thepetitioner to enjoy and utilize the premises bearing H.No.MlG-24, in the land admeasuring300.00 sq.ydssituated in Survey No.143& '144 Dharmareddy Colony, Phase-ll, Hydernagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMBATLANIKHIL REP. FOR
M/S. PILLIX LAW FIRM
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1 : GP FOR HOUSINt>
Counsel for the RespondentNos.2to 4: SRIC. BUCHIREDDY,
S.C. FOR TELANGANA STATEHOUSING BOARD
The Court made the following: ORDER
WRIT PETITION o.3292L of 2Ola
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
ORDER
Sri Rambatla Nikhil, iearned counsel representing M/s. Pillix Law Firm, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration by this Court.
Recording the above said submission of the learned counsel
for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in tl-ris case shall
stand closed. No order as to costs
o..'rro*rua8Yo[A -r't' 6,, ,/TRUECOPY// SECiIONOFFICER
To
i:f; :EE':"%iJnl["^','"$i6t"':r]j:'$i"ib's':1"';5'Hataa'lH;dera$30tourl
i TwoCD CoPtes' 6.one sParecoPY
MPrPr/
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1510912021
. ,.E 5T416
(
q
1B oclzul
ooJ
tt
ORDER
WP.No.32921 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
s
-
V.B. Rangaiah
The State of Telangana
Andhra Pradesh Housing Board (Telangana Entity)
The Executive Engineer (Housing)
The Competent Authority
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
