The High Court held that since an interim order granted earlier resolved the grievance regarding the petitioners' employment, no further orders were needed and the writ petition was necessarily closed without costs.
Writ petition closed without costs; no further orders required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITI ON NO: 3945 0F 2008
Between:
(All are working as Contractor Labour, Lower Sileru power House, A.p. GENCO., Mothugudem, khammam Distrbt.)
AND
...PETITIONERS
) The A P. GENCO., repres_ented by its Superintending Engineer, Civil (O&N/) Upper Sileru, Khammam Distrrct.
J. J],q,np 9EN99.,repby its ExecutiveEngrneer,,Civil O&M. Djvision-ilt,
.,.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of IVandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispense with the services of the petitioners, as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Judgments of this Hon'ble court as well as Apex court and consequently direct the respondents to continue the services of the petitioners on contract basis in the respondents organisation even though the contractor changes.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N.M. KRISHNAIAH
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SRI C. RAGHU (SC FOR Ap GENCO)
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUNIAR SHA'ILI
WRIT PETITION No.3945 of 2008
ORDER:
I . When the matter is taken up for hearing, le arned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners are working as contract labours in the respondent-organisation and this Co l'! was pleased to grant interim order on 26.02.2008 directing the respondents to continue the petitioners in service on the same terns and conditions, as ol then, until further orders. Learned counsel bl the petitioners further contended that in view of the interim ord:r granted by this Court, the grievance of the petitioners has been resolved and no further orders need to be passed in this writ petitior.
stand closed.
l
SD/. K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION FFICER
To, 1 One CC to Sri N.M. Krishnaiah, Advocate IoPUCI 2 One CC to Sri C. Raghu (SC FOR AP GENco) [oPrJcl J Two CD Copies 4 One Spare Copy CHR
HIGH COURT
DATED:1310912021
ORDER
W.P.No.3945 of 2008
-( y{E S aA )5:
!
o)
C)
0 I ocl2021
Jx"l'
l',,..I
CLOSING THE WRIT PETTTION WITHOUT COSTS.
ffir
,-,<br>t
1 issue framed by the court
whether further orders are required considering an interim order was granted resolving the petitioners' grievance.
P. Gnanesh and others
App. GENCO.
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
