In a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 151 CPC challenging faulty attendance uploading, the High Court held the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the matter with no costs attached.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 36302 OF 2015
Between:
A.SAIRAIM, S/o. VENKATAIAH, Age : 20 years, R/o Annanya Boys Hostel, Omkar Nagar, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad-500074 ...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to lssue a writ in the nature of [/andamus by declaring the illogical act of faulty uploading of the attendance by 2nd respondent as illegal, irrational, and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to correct the mistake by promoting the petitioner
1A112015(WPMP. NO: 46709 0F 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased direct the respondents to permit thepetitioner to appear for the annual examinations scheduled to be held from 09.11.2015
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N. HARINATH
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: SRI V. RAMCHANDER GOUD
SC FOR JNTU
Counsel for Respondent No. 2: SRI KIRAN PALAKURTHI
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
W.P.No.36302 OF 2015
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sutrrnits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
I
//TRUE COPYi/
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (,:l'
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0410212021
H E s 14 ,6-
oo I I FEB 2021
()
:1
*
ORDER
WP.No.36302 of2015
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITIONAS
INFRUCTUOUS,WITHOUT COSTS
+riv^-r"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication given the submissions made by the petitioner's counsel.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
A. Saíram
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad
Guru Nanak Institute of Technical Campus, Ibrahimpatnam
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
