This judgment is a short order where the High Court at Hyderabad held that the cause of action in a public interest litigation regarding student admission in Osmania University did not survive after an interim order was passed in favor of the petitioner in October 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
wRlT PETIION NO. 30400 0F 20'15
Between:
Jangam Pandu, S/o Narsimlu, Aged about26 Years, Occ: Student,R/o H No.1-83' Koaipally Toopran, Medak, lvledak District.
...'ET'T'ONER
AND
...RE''.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, Order orDirection, more particularly onein the nature of writ of Mandamus, to declare theactionof the respondentauthorities in not considering the case of thepetitioners as local candidatewith regard to the admission into tr/.P.Ed,(lvlaster ofPhysical Education)course as beingillegal, arbitrary and unco nstitutiona Iand consequently directthe respondents to grant admission into the courseof Master of Physical Education under the Local Quotain open category or underreserved category.
WPMP. NO: 39309 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the atfidavit filed in support of thepetition,the Highcourt maybe pleased to pass orders directing the respondentsauthorities to permit the petitioners herein to attend the counseling to be heldin the month of September, 2015 and to give admission to the course of Master of PhysicalEducationby treating them as local candidatein open category or under reservedcategory, pendingdisposal of main writPetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI GAJANANDCHAKRAVARTHI
Counsel for the Respondents:SRI DEEPAK BHATTAGHARJEE,
STANDING COUNSEL
The Court made the following:ORDER
,i l
IION' BLI| SRI .]US'I'IC T] ABI IINANI) I(T,I MA IT SIIAVII,I W.P.No.30400 of 2015
OIIDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for' the petitioner submits that the petitioner has lilecl the present Wrir Petition challenging the action of the respondents in not considering his case as local candidate with regard to the admission into the M.P.Ed., (Master of Physical Education) course lbl rhe acadernic year 2015-\6 and this Court glanted interim orciers on 07-10-2015 in 1-avour of the petitronel and in view ol'the sarne, no 1l' l'r-rrther orders need to be passed.
Learned Standing Counsel appearir.tg lorj'd respondent has also not dispLrteci aboul thc sarne.
Llaving considercd ilre said subrnissions, tlris Court is of the
view that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survivc.
Accordingly, the Writ Petitiorr is closccl. No cosLs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitiolls pending, if any. shall
stand closed.
\
\ SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// ($1 SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One QQ to !r! Gajanand Chakravarthi, Advocate tOpUCl ? 9n" QQt^o Sf Deepak Bhattacharjee, Standing CbunsetlOeUCl 3. Two CD Copies. MP
7
\ ;--
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410212021
ORDER
WP.No.30400 of 2015
1 ilE s TA i
a
oo
22fi}2021
* *
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
.2<br>rn
i
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging non-consideration as a local candidate survives for admission into the M.P.Ed. course.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jangam Pandu
Osmania University
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
