The judgment closes writ petitions challenging the denial of an NRI-sponsored engineering seat. The court noted the petitioner submitted the petition after intermediate orders on 19-08-2015, ruling no further orders were needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 24838 OF 2015
Between:
Kaushik Reddy Pamula, S/o. P.Jaya Bharath Reddy, Occ: Student,No. B-24, Cantan park, Pet Basheerabad, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad- 500 055.
...pETlTlONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the HighCourt may be pleasedto issue a Writ, Order of Directionmoreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action ofthe 2nd respondentin not allotting seat to the petitioner in Electronics and communications Engineering(ECE) underNRI sponsored quota as illegal, arbitrary,violativeprinciplesof naturaljustice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitutionof lndia and consequentlydirect the 2nd respondent to allot seat to thepetitioner in Electronicsand Communications Engineering (ECE) under NRI Sponsoredquota.
WPMP. NO: 32255 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High court may be pleased to directthe 2nd respondent to allot theprovisional admission to the petitioner in Electronics and communications Engineering(ECE) under NRI Sponsored quota pendingdisposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.I'V. RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1:SRI DEEPAKBHATTACHARJEE, SC FOROU
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2to 4: NONEAPPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
tlO!ll|.-l'- SRI ,lt-S'l'l(-h.\l]III,\l) Kt--\l \It SII.\ Il.l \'. I'}.No.2Jti38 of 20 I 5
otU)t lt:
\ hcn tlrc ntattct is Ltrlicn Lrn lirr' ltearirrr.t. l,llrr.netl c,rrrns.l Iir. the Pctitioncl subntitlc(l tltlt Lhe Iciitioner'ltls lllctl tirc Ir.cscnt \ r.ir I)etition e hlllcrrginq tlrc irction ol tltc lcsIonilcnts in no,r allotrin!i thc sciit to the petitiorrel irr lllectronics anrl (--orrrrrr-rnications in Engineering (ECE) course undel NIl,l sponsorccl cluota lbr rhc academic 1,ear 2015- 16 and this Court granted irrterim orders on l9-08-20 l5 in favour of the petitioner and in view of the sanrc, no further orders need to be passed.
Havirrg considered the said sLrbrnission, this Cour.t is of the
t ic',t titut ti',u'etrLrsc irr Lhc \ r'it i)ciirirl: riocs rtirl:tir.,. i\u.
r\ccoldingly, the Wiit I)eritiorrjs closed. No costs.
,\s lL .rctlrrcl. tltc ilisce lllirre i)ls l)r". lilions l.e ntling. il :rrrr. sluill
strrtttl c ltisccl
SD/. T.TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// ( i()
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410212021
ORDER
I
1 S T4 14-
(
c
'22 tEB 2021 cz
.L
* D r.. P,ri:;
W.P.No.24838 of 2015
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
/
L
)7
Kaushik Reddy Pamula
The Osmania University, Rep. by its Registrar
Chaitanya Bharathi lnstitute of Technology, Rep. by its Principal
Vineeth Rebdy Vuyyuru
Abhilash Reddy Dev;iinti
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
