Dismissed
Association of Liquor and Beer Suppliers, v. State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/27300/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF IMARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 27300 OF 2014
Between:
AND
((R-4 is impleaded as per Court Order, dated14.10.2014in W.P.M.P.No.38323 of 2014')
'..RESP.NDENTS
Petition under Articte 226 oflhe constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction ororderespeciallyin the natureof a writ of mandamus declaring that the circularNo.LC-ll/1033/2OllCDBlEx dated 25-2014issued by Respondent No.2 calling uponthe distilleriesin the State of Telangana onlyto install the required hardwareand software in their units for affixation of Holographic Excise Adhesive Labels("HEALs")while excludingthe suppliersfrom outside.the state from application of the saidcondition as being illegal, arbitrary and.violative of Article14 of the constitution oflndia and, consequently, directingthe Respondentsto make arrangement for affixationof HEALseven in respect of the products of the distilleries within the state ofTelanganawithoutinsistingthat the distilleries procurethe hardware and softwarerequiredfor the same.
WPMP. NO: 3 4177 0F 2014
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppodof the petition,the Highcoud maybe pleasedto passan order restraining theRespondents from insistingon the membersof the Petitioner No.1purchasing andinstallingthe hardwareand equipment in their units for affixation of Holographic ExciseAdhesive Labels(HEALS).
il2ll
WPMP. NO:39050 OF 2014
PetitionUnderSectionlSlCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedinthe affidavit firedin support of the petition, the High court may be pleased pass an order restrainingtheRespondentsfromtakinganycoercivemeasures,includingstopping supply ofExtra NeutralAlcohol, stopping paymentsfor suppliesmade'againstthe members of thepetitioner No.1 Associationfor not installing hardware and software intheirunitsforaffixationofHolographicExciseAdhesiveLabels(..HEALs.')during thependencY of the writ Petition.
Counsel for thePetitioners:SRI M. NAGA DEEPAKFOR SRI. CH PUSHYAMKIRAN
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1& 2: THE ADVOCATEGENERALFOR GP FOR PROHIBITIONAND EXCISE
CounselfortheRespondentNo.3:SRIA.SANTOSHKUMAR,SCFORAPBCL Counsel for the RespondentNo.4: SRIJ.V' PRASAD
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
THE HONOURABLD SRI JUSTICEK. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.27300 0F2014
ORDER:
Sri M.Naga Deepak,learned counsel appearingon behalf of Ch.Pushyam Kiran, learned counselfor the petitioners would submit that the cause inthe writ petition no longer survivesfor adjudication and hasbecome infructuous.
Recording the said submission,this Writ Petitionis
dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions,pending if any, shall also stand
d ismi ssed.
/ITRUECOPYII
SD l-K.vENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGI STRAR Cl() sECTloNoFFICER
s'ia'ie'r '"' r rr B3ii"'i[""& ft'IXU f;E?" ,t,Y'"$fJ?J Y'3J'""or re rans an a at ; i1?"&:il'fiFgffil]:'il'"':x ;:::I:ile
CHR
.
HIGH COURT
DATED:1810312021
ORDER
W.P.No.27300 of 2014
, .
a ?
."uoD
)t
3.1
$
oll" e\ ,.,
'
d"-,\s,
(.
H 9
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1r-l ,
Association of Liquor and Beer Suppliers
State of Telangana, Department of Prohibition and Excise
The Commissioner Prohibition & Excise, Telangana
Telangana Beverages Corporation Ltd.
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court