upon and propriety of insisting that surety be from the same district etc. The Apex Courl has categorically held that the principal purpose of bail is to insure that an accused person will return for trial if he is released after arrest. It further held that Article 14 of the Constitution of India protects all Indians qua Indians, within the territory of India. Article 350 sanctions representation to any authority, including a court, for redress of grievances in any Ianguage used in the Union of India. Equality befbre the law implies that even a vakalat or affirmation made in any State language according to the law in that State must be accepted everywhere in the territory of India save where a valid legislation to the contrary exists. Otherwise, an adivasi will be unfree in Free India, and likewise many other minorities. This divagation has become necessary to still the judicial beginnings, and to inhibit the process of making Indians aliens in their own homeland. Swaraj is made of united stuff. India is a Bharat, any person, from an)"lvhere in India can stand as surety. In the said case, the Magistrate has demanded sureties from his own District. On consideration of the facts of the said case, the Apex Court has also discussed about the law that prescribes sureties from outside or nonregional linguistic, some times legalistic, applications etc., and held at paragraph No.33 as follows:
