Dismissed

Guguloth Panthulu v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC17 Mar 2021CRLP/381/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought quashing of proceedings relating to atrocities. The High Court allowed withdrawal of the criminal petition and dismissed the same as withdrawn, with consequential closure of pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the criminal petition accorded; criminal petition dismissed as withdrawn; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Guguloth Panthulu Vs The State of Telangana and another — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 381 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

Guguloth Panthulu, S/o Setram, aged about 27^yearc, Occ. Vidya Volunteer, R/o. Mangaiah Banjara village, Chandurgonda Mandal, Badradri Kothagudem District.

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED - 1

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana and another, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad SHO, Chuncupally Police Station, Chuncupally, Bhdradri Kothagduem, Khammam District.

¶12

,,.. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶13

Bhukya Roja, D/o Shankar, aged 27 years, Occ. Student, Fl/o Qr, No.D-95, Babu Camp., Chunchupally, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶14

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTOCOMPLAINANT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to quash the proceedings in SC.No.19 of 2019 on the file of the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of cases relating to Atrocities against women at Khammam, against the Petitioner/Accused No.'1 .

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2O2O

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy of charge sheet in SC.No.19 of 2019, on the file of the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of cases relating to Atrocities against women at Khammam before this Honourable Court. l.A. NO: 2OF 2020

¶18

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in SC.No.19 of 2019, on the file of the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of cases relating to Atrocities agarnst women at Khammam including the appearance of the Accused No.1 Pending disposal of the Quash Petition in the interest of the^justice.

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri CH VENKAT RAMAN, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared forthe Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.381 of 2020

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Mr. Ch. Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted letter before the registry on 15-03-202 1 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the criminal petition.

¶25

2 . Permission is accorded. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrarvn.

¶26

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if an1, pending, shall stand closed.

¶27

SD/.K.ONESIM

¶28

,TRUE^COPY//

¶29

ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR q'

¶30

SECTION^OFFICER

¶31

to'", , ,n" Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases relating to Atrocities against Women at^Khammam'

¶32

2' The^{Station House officer,Chuncupally Police Station, Chuncupally,} -' Bhadradri Kothagduem' Khammam Distr'at'

¶33

6';; ccl"^{snr iH ver'xnr RAMAN' Advocate[oPUC]}

¶34

Two CCs^{to the puUf il'prosecutor'High Court for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶35

Two^{CD CoPies.}

TL gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED:1710312021

'f <br>1 H s T4 14:
oo 26 t'4AR 2021 z
.4,

-k !)

¶41

ORDER

¶42

CRLP.No.381 of²⁰²⁰

¶43

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL^PETITION

¶44

AS WITHDRAWN.

¶45

^\ Vrz)
6rt-iv

Guguloth Panthulu v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guguloth Panthulu v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Chilakala Jaya Lakshmi Vs The State of Telangana

N. Purushotham Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Jattani Naveen Vs The Principal Secretary, And 2 Others

Pradeep Kumar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and another

Md.Azgar Ali Vs The State, Station House Officer

Golusu Upender Vs Assistant Sub - Inspector of Police