Petitioner withdrew a writ petition challenging arrest/detention proceedings. The High Court permitted withdrawal. The writ petition and independent application were dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file before court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVIONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
wRtT PETIT|ON NO. 25487 0F 2021
Between:
Sateesh Chapparapu, S/o. C Venkata Ramana, Aged about 32 years, Resident of D.No. 12l134, Srinivasa Nagar, Porumamilla Village and lVandal, YSR Kadapa District
...PETrroNER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring theproceedings issued by the 2ndrespondent hereinvide Proceedings No. HYD/30/POL/PCC/53/2021, dated 2210412021as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequentlydirect to set aside and quashthe proceedings order passed by the Zndrespondentherein vide Proceedings No. HYD/30/POL/PCCl53l2021 , dated2210412021.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the High court may be pleasedto directed the respondents to stay of allfurther proceedingsin pursuanceof order passedby the 2nd respondent hereinvide ProceedingsNo. HYD/30/POLlPCCl53l2021,dated 2210412021pending disposalof the aboveWritPetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRICHALLA AJAYKUMAR
Counsel forthe RespondentNos. 1 & 2: SRI NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO, ASSISTANT SOLICITORGENERAL
Counsel forthe RespondentNo.3: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HOI.I'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
ORDER:
Leorned r:ounsel oppeoring for thepetitioner requests the Court topermit ihepetitioner to withdrow this writpetition with o liberty to file on opplicotion before the Court below under Circulor GSR 570.E.
Permissiorr is occorded.
Accordingly. the writ petition is dismissed os wilhdrown by
gronting liberly r:s proyed for. No order os to cosis.
Pending rniscelloneous peiitions, if ony, sholl stond closed.
SD/.T,TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1811012021
ORDER
WP.No.2S487 ctf 2021
( 1EL4
o
A? , t
t-l
F rL' j
c) s
s- ^!
;t.
v.:^1
? ti 01
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sateesh Chapparapu
The Union of India
The Regional Passport Officer
The Station House Officer
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
