Disposed

Smt. Kondaparthi Narayanamma v. Union of India and 3 Others

Telangana HC18 Oct 2021WP/11668/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition at the admission stage at the joint parties' consent. It directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's submitted representation regarding dependent family pension arrears and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider petitioner's representation submitted on 21.10.2020 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

Smt. Kondaparthi Narayanamma Vs Union of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

[/ONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 11668 OF 2 021

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

Smt. Kondaparthi Narayanamma,^{Wiolate Kondaparthi Atchaiah, Aged 80 years,} Occ. House Hold. R/ci H.No.6-2-71l9A, Jammibanda^{area,KhammamUrban} Mandal' Khammam District

¶8

...pETrroNER

¶9

AND

¶10

Union of lndia, Ministry of Home^{Affairs, Freedom Fighters Division,NDCC-ll} Buildinq, Jai Singh Roail, New Delhi,^{Rep. by Deputy Sebretaryto Govt.of lndia}

¶11

The Aiiounts Officer, Pay and Accounts^{Office (Pension and Misc.)2/10,} Jamnagar House HMA, New^Delhi.

¶12

2 State 6ank of lndia, Centralized^{pension ProcessingCentre, Rep. by its Asst.} General Manager. 1st floor, SCAB^{Building,LHO Complex,Koti, Hyderabad,} Telangana State 500 095.

¶13

The B"ranch Manager, State Bank of^{lndia, Zillaparishad Building,Wyra Road,} Khammam, Khammam District⁵⁰⁷ 002.

¶14

...RES'ONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of^{the constitution of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High court may be pleased} to issue a writ order or direction^{more particularly, one in the natureof writ of} Mandamus, declaring the letter^{F.No.CPPC/HYOIFF dt.21112021issued by the} respondent no.3 and not^{paying the arrearsof pension for 6 months lrom31212020} as illegal, arbitrary,^{violative of principlesof naturaljustice and contrary to the letter} no.11213409197-FF(HC) dl.16l12l2o2o^{of the respondentno.1 and consequently} direct the respondents to^{pay arrearsof pensionlrom31212020 to till July, 2020(6} months) i.e. from the date of^{receipt of application.}

¶16

Prayer is amended as^{per Court Order dated 20'09.202'l in l.A.No'2 ot 2021}

¶17

lA NO: 1 F 2021

¶18

Petition under Section 151^{CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High court may be pleased to direct} the respondents to^{pay arrears of pension trom 31212020to July, 2020 (6 months)to} the petitioner i.e. from the^{date of receipt of applicationfor dependentfamily} pension, pending disposal of the above^{writ petition in the interestof justice.} Prayer is amended as^{per Court Order dated20.09} '202'l^{in l'A'No'2 ol 202'l '}

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRI M. V' HANUMANTHA RAO} counsel for the Respondent^{Nos. 1 & 2: SRINAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO'}

¶20

ASSISTANT SOLICITOR^GENERAL

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.3 & 4: '-}

¶22

The Court made the^{following: ORDER}

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR^SHAVILI

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.11668 ot2021

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

This writ pelition is being disposed of oi ihe stoge of odmission with the consenl of leorned counsel for the respeciive^porties.

¶27

This writ^petition is filed seeking the following relief:

¶28

"...... to issue a writ, order or direction more^{particularty one} in the naturL' of Writ of Mandamus dectaring the tetter F.No. CPPC/HYD/FF dt.21112021 issued by the respondent No.3 and not paying the arrears of pension for 6 months frcm 3lZ/2020 as ittegat, arbitrary, viotative of^principtes of naturat^justice and contrary to the letter No.112i 3409/97-FF(HC) dt.16117/2020 of the respondent no.1 and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to^pay arrears of^pension from 3/217020 tc, titt Juty 2020 (6 months) i.e., from the date of receipt of aoplication...... ".

¶29

Heord Sri M.V.Honumontho Roo, leorned counsel oppeoring

¶30

for lhe petiiioner ond the leorned Assisloni Solicilor Generol oppeoring for the respondenls.

¶31

lt hos been conlended by lhe peiilioner lhol her husbond wos o freedom fighler ond he expired on 27,1 I.20I9. Her husbond wos gronted freedom fighters pension vide proceedings doled 29.01 .2004. Loter on, she hod opplied for freedom fighters pension under dependonl quoto ond the respondenis were^pleosed to sonction freedom fighters pension in her fovour vide proceedings doted 03.02.2020.

¶32

The grievonce of the petitioner is thot the respondenls ore not poying orreors of pension ond she is entitled for orreors of pension from the dole on which her husbond expired. In those set of circumstonces, she hos submiiled o deloiled representolion lo the respondenls ot 2l ,102020 requesling lo poy orreors of freedom

¶33

¶34

;

¶35

fighlers^{pension. But, so for, the respondenishove not possed ony} orders on^{the soidrepresentotion'}

¶36

6,Therefore,leornedcounse|oppeoringforlhepetitionerhod conlended^{lhot opproprioteorders be possed in lhe writ petition} directing^{the respondentsto considerthe represenlolion submilted} by the^{pelltioner on 21.10.2020ond poss opproprioteorders in} occordonce^{with low.}

¶37

Generol^{oppeoring for the} 7. Leorned^{AssistoniSolicitor} respondents^{hod coniended thot since ihe representotionof the} peiitioner is^{pending with the respondents'the respondenis would} consider^{the some ond poss oppropriole orders in occordoncewilh} low.

¶38

This Court,^{hoving consideredthe rivol submissionsmode by} the leorned^{counselfor lhe respecliveporties'is of the considered} view thot^{this writ pelition con be disposed of direclingthe} respondents^{io considerthe representotionsubmittedby ihe} peiitioneron2l.lo.2o2oondpossopproprioteordersin occordonce^{wilh low' within oreosonobleperlod oflime'} preferobly wiihin^{o period of eightweeksfrom the dote of receiptof} o coPY^{of lhis order'}

¶39

Accordingly,^{lhls wrii peliiionis disposed of No costs'}

¶40

Pending^{miscelloneous petitions' if ony' sholl stond closed'}

¶41

SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT,REGISTRAR //'RUE coPY/' .Ecrk;ft^oFFtcER

¶42

to'',. -n" Deputv Secretarv to Ggi(^ol ho:u,,.|lion,9lJl9l1 Y,:it'T:l,Ho.[i Atf'''"' Freedom Fishters^{pii#'i"r'r'oct-iiE'lHi"s'Jai Sinoh Road' New Delhi'}

¶43

, rhc Accounts oricJi'"pl;;;^{A;;;;ii'o?iJ" ]Pensionand Misc ) 2/10'} - irrnroa House HMA, New Delhi ^^-.-^,i-^..r ^ancinn^{P '.pt}

¶44

1. The Asst.^{General Mfi;g;;: 5iri" aunkof lndia, centralizedpension Processing} Centre,^{1sr noor, s6iff"rjri6;;,LHO Comptex, Koti, Hyderabad'Telangana}

¶45

. ?ii"t?::i.ti,i"nrn",,^{st?te. BllLqllndia' Zilla ParishadBuildins' wvra Road'} s Khammam, o"?,'cb]"'sii^{Khammam District rr,4 v 'i]i""'ntha 50 /-uuz'R"oAdvocate IoPUCI} 6. one cc^{to Sri Nrrr;;;;;;?i;j#;;;R'';'-A'lbtntsbricitorGenerar(OPUC)} 7. Two CD^CoPies'

B. One SPare^CoPY

HIGH COURT

DATED:1811012921

{ e STAI€
('
e
o(, n fl iltl, t,'
.l
7+
<br>

¶51

ORDER

¶52

WP.No.11668 of 2021

¶53

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.

¶54

% O"\ @

Smt. Kondaparthi Narayanamma v. Union of India and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Kondaparthi Narayanamma v. Union of India and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Janke Venkata Reddy Vs The Chief Manager

Symbiosis Educational Society, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Kerala Model School (E/M) Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Peddi Ramesh and 2 others Vs State Bank of India and another

Sateesh Chapparapu Vs The Union of India

Hussain Mohammad Ali Shaikh, Vs The State of Telangana