Dantharaveni Kanukaiah v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and an application under Section 151 CPC both as withdrawn, without ordering costs.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and an application under Section 151 CPC both as withdrawn, without ordering costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H,GH COURT FOR TT A ru JS..JfJXroF rE LA N GA NA (Spec iar o.is;-nli.iu?f,;i"tion,)
TUESDAY, THE E rwo iH b Liil N;i :X,y.fli."r?i 6r^H
rHE HoNouRor,_. .$lurt?lu"! T.AMARNATH GouD
Between:
WRIT PETITI ON NO:1 09080F 2021
t",,r*'iiu[i'i?'.3"ii,#tlsif ffi ";rlr:,ar,iitdh?;fmsi?
AND
.PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit riteo therewith, tne Hign cor,.t ,.nlv t"-pleaseo to issue a writ, order or direction more .particulaity on" in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the 4rd respondent in conductinj in" r_r.rv oru* system in place of Auction cailed on sltostzozt as iilegal, arbitrar!, nao-in-ii* rno consequently direct the 4th respondent to renew the lease period for'Shop No.12 for a further period of 2 years frcm 2021-2021
IANO:1OF2 021
Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the notice vide Letter No. G.p.B. No.13/2021, d1.3010312021 including the eviction of the petitioner from shop No.12. situated at Bejjanki Grampanchyath Shoping compled, Bejjanki Village and mandat. Siddipet District, pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. Y RAVINDRA PRASAD
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : SRI G.NARENDER REDDY
S.C. FOR GPP/ZPPIMPP
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICET' AMARNATH GOUD P o 1 of 1
ORDER:
In view ofthe letter dated 04'06'2021 of the leamed counselfor
petitionerseekingpermissionfor withdrawalof the writ petition' this
writ petitionis dismissed as withdrawn'No orderas to costs'
Pending miscellaneousapplications,if any, shall stand closed'
\
//TRUE COPY'
SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHARRAO \ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (,lt"
SECTION OFFICER
To 1. One CC to Sri Y. Ravindra Prasad, Advocate [OPUC]
Kj.
.O
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0810612021
ORDER
T4 I€:
(
'? t,9
oo 1 7 JUI'! 202! o
4
fi's ir c
WP.No.10908 ot2021
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUTCOSTS.
XA*
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The Bejjanki Gramaanchayath, Bejjanki Village and Mandar
4th Respondent
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court