In writ petitions challenging the non-cancellation of an excise license, the petitioner failed to appear. The court, noting the absence of the petitioner despite prior non-appearance, dismissed the matters in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 25280 OF 2010
Between:
The Andhra Pradesh, Civil Liberties Committee(APCLC), rep.byits Mahaboobnagar District General SecretaryM.Naraasimhulu S/oM. Laxmanna, aged about 33yrs occ: Teacher R/oH.No.11-20,Kesavanagar, Makthal, Mahaboobnagar District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of lMandamus declaring the action of theofficialrespondents herein in not taking action against the non official Respondent wine Shop by name Sri Sai Wine Shop earlier called as lakshmi Narasimha Wine shop situated at the premises of Padamati Anjaneya Swamy(Endowment )Temple opposite APSRTC Bus Stand, Makthal, Ivlahaboobnagar District in spite of repeated representations to cancel the License issued on them is unlawful, illegal and Arbitrary apart from violative of the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition and ExciseAct and also against the Article 21 of constitution of lndia Consequently directthe official respondents to take all steps to cancel the license of the unofficial respondent Wine Shop and evict it from there which is causinghardship to the common citizen around the area.
WPMP. NO: 32301 OF 2010
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitio;, t-he High court may oe prlasea to suspend the License and permit of the 3rd respondeit Sri sai wine sf,op-earler called as lakshmi Narasimha wine shop situated at the premises of iadamati Anjaneya Swamy(Endowment) Temple, opposite APSRTC Ors sLnO, ,r[tnrf, Mahaboobnagar district.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. D SURESH KUMAR(NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Gp FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE
Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following:
Item No.8
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
W.P.No.25280 of 2010
ORDERI (Per the Hon'blc the Chicf Justice Hima Kohli)
L The present petition was listed on 18.03.2021, when none had appeared for the petitioner. As a result, it was directed to be listed today 'for dismissal'. Same is the position today. None ispresent on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that thepetitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition.
for non-prosecution alongwith the pending applications, ifany.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR It./
SECTIONOFFTCER
To,
PN/
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/04/2021
ORDER
WP.No.25280 of 2010
TA r€
1
oJt
22 APR 2021
r-)
t
Dismissing the WP ln default and for non-prosecution.
,8r
P.
)4
xp
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The Andhra Pradesh, Civil Liberties Committee Rep. by M.Naraasimhulu
District Collector, Mahaboobnagar
Excise Superintendent
M/s Sri Sai Wines
HIMA KOHLI
B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
