C. Gopaiah and 37 Ors. v. Secy., Rev. Dept. and 8 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged the inaction of authorities in closing a stone crusher unit causing environmental pollution and crop damage. The court noted that the closure order had been revoked and permission granted subsequently upon compliance. The petition is accordingly closed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners' prayer to close the stone crusher unit and award damages is dismissed as there is now a valid permit after revocation of the closure order.
What the court decided
\
ATHYD E RAB AD
(-
H r cHc o u Rr' " iJ|"t":"1 8T,,n 31, ::i3}8fl i'i r H uRs D AY'r rx,tJ'ft,tJ RiI *of"T'H TWOTHOU
PRESENT
| THEHON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI THEHON'BLESRIJUSTI&B' VIJAYSENREDDY ULRITPETITION NO: 5401OF 2017 |
|---|
| cl(ltarn'iiah' Between: |
| 1) ^r..,"irlonxiall.S t^ti',::'::"";.?rcc:\rrierrltL,e ageouo)"'"'- |
| ) ;r:";'i.;':l3 i 1[lil11.,",'' |
| i) ThataDarnodar'S o Nrr';riah' u*.Jou:"utt'occ:A glicttllut'e |
| GadalaRavindrarn'S'o,'i:ctltaratttaiah' igJJovt^tt'occ:Agtricrritttre 4) |
| DondatiNirrnalaRac Srt'Rarneiah' ;il;ijYears'occ:Agrictrlture' 5) |
| Kiil.iliVcnkare:rrarluS '',Narsaiah' ^l.a+q',..rt.O;c:Actiiitlture' 6) |
| I(arral(omatiN4anmaclhrtl{ao'Sio Ramaiah' aged50lears' 7) |
| Sl'railil(asimS o' \lasLlttr' , aqed'<0learsOcc:'!rl'il jlllle 8) |
| fruar"f,L;rli-rhn',i.\'''1lirirdr.'rirh' .g.i',,teats Occ:''\sri'liltrrc' 9) |
| BodaBangariS o l)hrn!'irrgh' ,g"lio1'Jarsocc'AglicLrltLtrc i0) |
| 1111(arlrp:rtiBii'sh'rlllS I '':l:liliri'' ageri'i1 leat.s |
| ll.l Cll'rrLlrlll'uli(i orrrtilitl'':l\rir'lilr'':tI-inganr' '-' .gao60lcar-toccl'\gltelLiLLLre' |
| 131Lhuall'iirirtclcr' So''enl'rtal(rishraiah' ,-' uga,l49t'cars'Occ:''\gricLtltr'ire' |
| 14) ThataKrishnarnaiah'S/o'N araiah' aged851eals.Occ:Agricutture' |
| ThataVishrvesllwar Rao'S'oVenlutaKrishtaiah' aged53Year,'Occ:Agticulture 1s) |
| ThataFareedMastan,S/oVenkaiah' aged 50Years,Ooc:AgricLriture' 16) |
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition alleging arbitrary closure of a stone crusher unit and damage to crops should be allowed.
Whether the closure order passed against the stone crusher unit was later revoked and permission granted following compliance.
Whether the petition praying for closure and damages should be closed given the subsequent status of the permit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Resident farmers of Pindipurulu, Khammam District
- respondent
State of Telangana
- respondent
District Collector, Khammam
- respondent
Divisional Officer, Khammam
- respondent
Tahsildar, Thirumalayapalem
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/5401/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court